“Is Google Making Us Stupid?” an article by Nicholas Carr (2008) mostly examines the premise and effect of how the Internet influences our studying, thinking, and writing routines. It also alters how our minds attempt to conform to evolving times in the context of reading. From my perspective, I agree it is making us unintelligent since the consequence on the aforementioned characteristics is purely negative. Nicholas Carr (2008) harshly attacks not only Google, but also its sophisticated toolbars, believing that they may one day transform humans into machine-like animals. Individuals will not be examining books after obtaining or searching for content on the Internet; therefore, the argument that electronic media lowers people’s thinking capacity is a more legitimate point in this regard.
The net’s predominant reading approach may be undermining our potential for the sort of meaningful learning that evolved when an antecedent invention, the publishing companies, made extensive and complicated compositions of writing widespread. When we utilize the Internet, we are only information interpreters. Our capacity to analyze the text and build the rich cognitive associations that occur when we read intently and without interruption is largely impaired (Carr, 2008). Given the importance of the issue raised by the author, his use of specific examples to support his thesis clearly suggests that Google is making its users foolish.
The details and figures used in this piece are quite specific and have been thoroughly verified. For example, the author begins with a slew of eye-catching examples to pique readers’ interests (Carr, 2008). Then he slips in his sensible argument to show that Google is certainly driving individuals lazier and more mechanized, particularly those who utilize the Internet (Carr, 2008). He emphasizes that people are not looking online in the classic sense; rather, modern ideas of ‘reading’ are surfacing as consumers ‘power browse’ straight down through titles, contents sections, and abstracts in search of quick solutions (Carr, 2008). It almost appears that people go online to escape conventional studying.
Finally, the author argues that by depending on the Internet to access information, we forsake conventional heritage, which enhances our cognitive power. It is the equivalent of abandoning what is honorable in our lives (Carr, 2008). The Internet is not the alphabet, and while it may eventually supersede the publishing press, it delivers something very separate (Carr, 2008). Profound reading, as encouraged by a series of printouts, is important not only in terms of intelligence we gain from the author’s ideas, but also for the psychological oscillations those words cause within our own thinking. We establish our own preposition, infer our own deductions and comparisons, and cultivate our own thoughts in the silent spaces brought up by persistent, uncompromised studying of a book (Carr, 2008). As I see it, profound reading is inseparable from serious introspection.
It should be noted that this does not imply that the Web has no positive consequences on individuals who use it. Every creation contains both good and harmful aspects in similar proportion. Finally, knowledgeable humans are less exposed to natural features, which prevents them from reading written texts. Carr’s (2008) argument rests around his peculiar view of the Web, through which I agree. Because the progress of content in our period is so diversified, it is important to recognize that various types of online reading are obtainable. I believe that if these tools are used, it will only benefit people.
Reference
Carr, N. 2008. Is google making us stupid? The Atlantic.