Nurses identify and implement evidence-based concepts to maximize the health outcomes of their patients. The Circle of Caring Model is a powerful theory that guides practitioners to engage their colleagues and health beneficiaries. This paper gives a detailed analysis of this theory and how it differs from holistic and biomedical nursing frameworks.
Qualities of the Circle of Caring Model
The Circle of Caring Model is a powerful framework that all professionals can consider to improve medical services. The first quality issue associated with this theory is the effectiveness of social and behavior change (SBC) interventions throughout the care delivery continuum (Price, 2016).
Those involved should consider the needs and perspectives of providers and beneficiaries. SBC interventions will influence behaviors, attitudes, and views of health professionals and patients during each stage. The anticipated result is the formulation of superior programs for delivering high-quality services. A good example of this model in practice is when clinicians form multidisciplinary teams, engage family members, and create appropriate attributes for improving the nursing process.
The second quality is the applicability of SBC interventions in each stage. During the Before Stage, participants receive inspiration and create the best environment for supporting change. Practitioners can raise awareness, minimize misconceptions, maximize self-efficacy, and set the right norms. The Building Stage empowers patients, transforms providers’ behaviors, and builds trust. These aspects will transform communication, foster interactions, and promote positive perceptions (Price, 2016).
The After Stage creates the best opportunity for enhancing follow-up and reinforcing linkages. The introduced SBCs will become evidence-based routines for promoting performance depending on the intended outcomes. Referral systems might emerge to ensure that community members receive exemplary services.
Differences: Holistic Theories and Biomedical Nursing
Within the past four decades, new models have emerged that guide health professional to provide exemplary health services. One of them revolves around the power of holistic nursing. Professionals using these theories will factor their patients’ attitudes that contribute to satisfaction, happiness, and recovery (Zamanzadeh, Jasemi, Valizadeh, Keogh, & Taleghani, 2015). Such models promote the use of knowledge, intuition, nursing process, and experience to establish meaningful relationships with targeted patients.
These attributes differ from the qualities of the Circle of Caring Model. This is true since the latter seeks to guide both caregivers and beneficiaries to transform their behaviors and social values. While holistic theories seek to empower the targeted individuals, SBC interventions create long-lasting initiatives for supporting the health demands of both beneficiaries and caregivers.
The biomedical model has become a powerful theory for guiding nurses to meet their patients’ health expectations. This framework mainly targets biological factors that cause specific diseases. Practitioners will apply this theory to diagnose different illnesses and offer the right remedies to treat them. This approach differs from the Circle of Caring Model since it ignores the social, environmental, and psychological forces that might affect patients’ health outcomes (Mazzotta, 2016).
This is something quite different since the proposed SBC interventions create the best environment for promoting positive relationships and care delivery procedures. For example, a practitioner who focuses mainly on biological aspects will be acting in accordance with biomedical nursing. The Circle of Caring Model is, therefore, comprehensive and considers all social and environmental attributes capable of dictating the quality of the targeted health outcomes.
Conclusion
The above discussion has indicated that nurses can implement different models to meet their patients’ medical needs. Since such frameworks tend to have different qualities and principles, it is appropriate for NPs to combine them depending on the intended health aims. Such an approach will ensure that more people receive high-quality medical services.
References
Mazzotta, C. P. (2016). Biomedical approaches to care and their influence on point of care nurses: A scoping review. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(8), 93-101. Web.
Price, M. (2016). Circle of care modeling: An approach to assist in reasoning about healthcare change using a patient-centric system. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), 546-555. Web.
Zamanzadeh, V., Jasemi, M., Valizadeh, L., Keogh, B., & Taleghani, F. (2015). Effective factors in providing holistic care: A qualitative study. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 21(2), 214-224. Web.