The process of cognition with relation to different areas of human life is guided by the methods for making forecasts on the basis of available data. From this perspective, the efficiency of this complex initiative is conditional upon the credibility of initial information. Even though some claims are made regarding philosophical skepticism as a reliable approach, it is critical to develop one’s critical thinking skills to discern the truth from common misconceptions.
The possibility of gaining knowledge for the mentioned objective is guaranteed by careful consideration of the evidence. In this situation, it can be denied based on the absence of practical experience, as in the case of global events affecting the world population; however, this solution is not optimal. The chance for improving the precision in predictions is worth relying on due to the lack of other ways to ensure the well-being of all people.
In this respect, the idea of accepting the dubious nature of facts for their further confirmation or rejection seems more efficient in establishing the truth. For instance, one might not be sure that a certain climate event will happen within the following five years, but the lack of certainty is not the reason to dismiss this assumption. It means that the best path to achieving the understanding of processes influencing humanity is to avoid making hasty decisions about the accuracy of one or another piece of information.
In conclusion, the controversy between the ways to learn the truth and acquire credible knowledge can be resolved with regard to the drawbacks of the described approaches as applied to the collective good. Even though some scholars might claim that the presence of evidence from the beginning of the investigation is the key to clarity, this solution might cause unnecessary limitations. Thus, despite the absence of explicit guidelines to this endeavor, it is inadvisable to reject evidence until additional data are gathered.