Healthcare policies significantly influence the quality of service rendered among patients since it is attributed to practitioners’ proficiency. According to research, different guidelines impact the local and international medical care delivery approach (Kokko & Kork, 2021). One of the countries that prominently appreciates the institutionalization of distinct values on people’s welfare is the United States of America (Goldenberg et al., 2020). The factor rendered the articulation of critical roles and responsibilities of the various administrative organs contributing to the affordable plan for the residents. There is adept parallelism between the medical sector’s operational outline and proposition 63. Proposition 63 is a legal framework that proficiently promotes coherence in the ramification of the laws to other practices under the spectral view of mental health index (Ashwood et al., 2018). Apt coordination among all stakeholders in the strategizing and implementation of the framework fosters a profound trickle-down effect of accrued benefits in the healthcare sector.
Proposition 63 encapsulates a framework that provides regulations concerning the distribution of ammunition. There is a profound similarity between the provisions of proposition 63 and healthcare-based policy. Proposition 63 articulates that it is vital to assess the mental health index of individuals to render social justice (Bambauer, 2005). The distinctive approaches that render coherence and interdependence under the spectrum of sustainable exploitation of the values encompass stakeholders’ participation, healthcare services, value-based healthcare model, and Medicaid policy. The constructs profoundly articulate the significance of the relationship and contribution towards boosting the welfare of Americans.
Stakeholders’ Participation Healthcare Policy Process
The participation of all stakeholders is a guideline that significantly attributes to the boost in medical service provision. The public health sector is an institution that significantly impacts human society’s cohesion, growth, and development. In this case, different stakeholders seek to participate in the implementation of the medical policies as well as its facilitation to boost its standards. The major contributors in the health sector encompass the government, private sector, and non-governmental organizations (Kokko & Kork, 2021). Nevertheless, the federal, state and local administrations face many challenges in their roles in the public sector. The efficiency of the public health system heavily relies on the collaborative efforts between the authority and the private sector in the development and implementation of regulations. Ideally, the critical role of the incumbency entails the creation of guidelines that promote the efficient delivery of health services.
A policy analysis mainly relies on the parties’ ability to objectively defend a particular concept based on the historical and progressive overview. In this case, the involvement of participants with a common ideology is an approach that renders proficient results during a debate due to the necessity to ascertain the details. One of the core factors during a contest entails showcasing a theorem’s relevance based on measuring both the advantages and disadvantages. It is a practice that convinces audiences and the personal reflection due to the affirmation of bias. Regulation plays a crucial role in steering the activities and operations within a particular spectrum. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the individuals to focus on the ethical and moral perspective to enhance the comprehension of the mainframes (Halpren-Ruder, 2020). Arguments foster a dialogue among the people that renders the sharing of information based on the dynamic viewpoint of action plans. Thus, the commitment among the groups based on the perceived aspect is an empowerment tool during the altercations. The process is akin to the essence of engagement among dynamic institutions in gun control procedure through proposition 63 (Ashwood et al., 2018). The effectiveness of the rules relies on adept coordination among all personnel during the planning and implementation process.
Healthcare Services Policy Process
One of the significant roles of the government involving the policy implementation enshrines the facilitation in the development of effective medical-based tools. The establishment of efficient health facilities fosters the effective delivery of emergency services. In 2001, the U.S administration faced a significant challenge once there was a bioterrorism attack of anthrax through mail delivery services (Van de Goor et al., 2017). The medical facilities, namely the laboratories, faced the problem of managing the flow of sample tests to find the vaccination and cure. On the other hand, the authority encountered a significant hindrance in fostering efficient service delivery due to the protocol policy that all processes must follow due process. Although the procedure promotes accountability in the decision-making process, it is a phenomenon that slows down the effectiveness and timeliness in the delivery of services.
Primarily, it is the role of the federal, state, and local governments to assess the needs and status of the health institution. Ideally, it is paramount that the administration assesses the health institutions based on their staffing and availability. It is a means of ensuring that the public receives quality health services. Further, the assessment assists in determining the state of the healthcare workers. The intensity of services depends on the level of motivation from the healthcare workers (Khatoon, 2020). Therefore, it is essential that the government assesses both the health facility status and the workers to assert the standards of the healthcare services.
The second part of the government is the development of policy. It is one of the roles that the administration faces a significant challenge, especially in integrating the practical and theoretical approach with the guidelines. One of the critical problems in the healthcare framework involves the abound consequences from the implementation of judgmental forecasting. Although the authority focuses on the general issues of policy implementation, it becomes a challenge to incorporate the healthcare workers’ input in the development process (Dash et al., 2019). As a result, the various stakeholders conflict regarding strategies and the relevance to the consequences of decisions made in the field.
The final role of the government involves enhancing the assurance to the public concerning the legitimacy of the healthcare system. In this case, researchers postulate that the healthcare system’s credibility depends on the administration’s investment in assuring the public (Dash et al., 2019). If the executive shows lagging in the implementation process, the community lacks confidence in the public healthcare system and instead prefers the private sector. Therefore, it is essential that the authority significantly fosters assertive measures to the public concerning the credibility of the healthcare system.
There is an interdependent relationship between healthcare service policy and proposition 63 under the spectrum of managerial initiatives. The regulation of gun control profoundly depends on the engagement of all stakeholders. The lack of coordination risks the illegal distribution and use of the ammunition, hence articulating a mental health index (Ashwood et al., 2018). In the medical field, practitioners’ accountability is to optimally engage clients and counterparts to establish solutions to core challenges hindering a high-quality service delivery system in treating mentally-related issues (Loftus et al., 2020; Halpern et al., 2020). In this case, entities involved in the two distinctive practices focus on objectivity issues to alleviate any form of bias during policy planning and implementation.
Value-based Healthcare Model Policy Process
One of the significant factors that influence the quality of healthcare provided is the implemented models in the various healthcare institutions. The healthcare model gears the development of organizational culture in distinctive facilities. Therefore, it is essential that medical-based management focuses on establishing an efficient model that boosts the quality and appraisal of healthcare services. The value-based healthcare model is profoundly innovative and fosters the incorporation of the interdisciplinary care delivery system (Halpren-Ruder, 2020). In this case, all stakeholders engage in establishing policies and mechanisms that enhance the care providers’ performance. Ideally, the compensation and rewarding of the healthcare institutions become subject to the performance through the number of patients with reduced cases of re-hospitalization.
Primarily, the value-based healthcare delivery system focuses on implementing policies that promote the provision of value and quality healthcare services. In this case, the providers get rewarded due to the increase in the number of new patient cases and a reduced re-hospitalization rate. As much as it benefits the nurses and the management in ensuring that the care providers offer quality services, the patients reap the benefit of excellent amenities and practical treatment approaches. In most cases, the efficiency of the treatment involves increasing the participation of all stakeholders and procedures such as home care services and frequent follow-up strategies (Halpren-Ruder, 2020). Therefore, the patients establish a significant relationship with the care providers due to the integrated treatment approach that seeks to reduce the rate of re-hospitalization.
There is a significant interdependent relationship between healthcare quality and leadership. It is the mandate of the management to monitor and ensure the proficient implementation of policies and the use of resources. Patient care is a service-oriented phenomenon encompassing the optimal exploitation of dynamic approaches to enhance the experience among all personnel (Sfantou et al., 2017). An excellent example of a practice that relies on the participation of administration is the implementation of the metaparadigm mainframe that asserts the level of treatment and recovery among all clients. The governance system highly determines the hallmark of medication within the industry hence the importance of integrating the two major entities.
The follow-up policy process is a quotient that adeptly influences the effectiveness of proposition 63 and quality assurance in the healthcare sector. Research by Halpren-Ruder (2020) indicates that the productivity among the care providers and customer satisfaction depend on the participation of all stakeholders in developing strategies of approving the medical treatment aspects. In a different spectrum, Sontag-Padilla et al. (2018) stipulate that it is essential to assess the mental health index among students to understand the rampant illegal use of guns. Over the decades, the regulation of ammunition and ownership is a debate among U.S citizens due to the lack of efficient follow-up procedures. In this case, the research depicts a distinctively varied mental stability issue demanding the development of an effective epilogue among teenage learners concerning peaceful coexistence and the importance of security.
The Medicaid Insurance Policy Process
There is a plan of shifting the present Medicaid funding specifically to a block grant exemplary. One of the main issues in the financial management of Medicaid resources involves the budgeting limits on direct safety-net health programs, especially for the dynamic population (Sfantou et al., 2017). Effective healthcare management involves all stakeholders, such as Centre for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the federal government, in the decision-making process to improve the sustainable growth in the effectiveness of Medicaid.
The Centre for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is more concerned with the act of administering the world’s major health programs. Another role for CMS is the management of the insurance policies for U.S citizens. The organization is also concerned with collecting and analyzing data and producing various research reports. CMS is greatly concerned with managing the Administrative Simplification Standards associated with the Health Insurance Profitability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). The Administrative Simplification Standards’ primary usage is the critical implementation of the adoption, which conducts are related to the national electronic health care records, enforcing the HIPPA rules, and guaranteeing patients’ security and privacies. The integral participation of all stakeholders in the implementation process of the policy is a sustainable approach that boosts efficiency in service delivery (Marshall et al., 2021). An interplay of both institutions’ roles fosters a sustainable improvement in the healthcare sector decision-making process with a profound support system from the technological tools.
The insurance policy is an entity that shows similar value to the provisions in proposition 63. Ownership of ammunition is a factor that faces a threat based on the variance in the measuring quotient of the mental health index. According to Collins et al. (2019), the stigmatization of students with psychological health issues is one of the prominent factors that asserts resolution to conflict and violence using guns. Although proposition 63 provides an affirmative approach to intensify awareness campaigns, it is vital to establish an indemnity among the victims, such as access to immediate psychiatric assistance. The concept is akin to the role of Medicaid in intensifying the affordability of healthcare services among all nationalities.
Other Policy Processes
The policy processes not used in the research engulf the setting of programs and the consideration of guideline options. During the development of regulation, it is vital to establish the key agendas in the process. The approach poses an imminent effect on determining the core challenges affecting distinctive sectors (Leonard et al., 2017). In this case, the stakeholders adeptly address the issues based on prioritization hence rendering an efficient scale in the resolutions (Marshall et al., 2021). The indication of other aspects promoting dynamic outcomes fosters an apt domain towards intensifying the contribution of the conceptual frameworks. Effective and competent healthcare services advance peoples’ quality of living.
In conclusion, the effectiveness of healthcare policies profoundly depends on the ability of the policymakers to integrate both facts and social elements. Ideally, the central role of the government in the healthcare sector is fostering the improvement of the standards of healthcare service delivery. However, the administration faces a significant challenge in the implementation process of the policies due to the importance of involving all stakeholders. Failure to involve all entities leads to conflict, especially between health workers and the management team. The poor integration of the real-time decision-making consequences with judgmental forecasting stems from the vital issue of conflicts. Therefore, it is vital that the authority engages the health workers without using biased forms in the implementation process.
References
Ashwood, J. S., Kataoka, S. H., Eberhart, N. K., Bromley, E., Zima, B. T., Baseman, L., Marti, A., Kofner, A., Tang, L., Azhar, G., Chamberlin, M., Erickson, B., Choi, K., Zhang, L., Miranda, J., & Burnam, M. A. (2018). Evaluation of the mental health services act in Los Angeles County: Implementation and outcomes for key programs. Rand Health Quarterly, 8(1). Web.
Bambauer, K. Z. (2005). State mental health policy: Proposition 63: Should other states follow California’s lead?. Psychiatric Services, 56(6), 642-644. Web.
Collins, R. L., Wong, E. C., Breslau, J., Burnam, M. A., Cefalu, M., & Roth, E. (2019). Social marketing of mental health treatment: California’s mental illness stigma reduction campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 109(S3), S228-S235. Web.
Dash, S., Shakyawar, S. K., Sharma, M., & Kaushik, S. (2019). Big data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 1-25. Web.
Goldenberg, T., Reisner, S. L., Harper, G. W., Gamarel, K. E., & Stephenson, R. (2020). State policies and healthcare use among transgender people in the US. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(2), 247-259. Web.
Halpern, S. D., Truog, R. D., & Miller, F. G. (2020). Cognitive bias and public health policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jama, 324(4), 337-338. Web.
Halpren-Ruder, D. (2020). E-Health and healthcare quality management: Disruptive opportunities. Rhode Island Medical Journal, 103(1), 12-15. Web.
Khatoon, A. (2020). A blockchain-based smart contract system for healthcare management. Electronics, 9(1), 94. Web.
Kokko, P., & Kork, A. A. (2021). Value-based healthcare logics and their implications for Nordic health policies. Health Services Management Research, 34(1), 3-12. Web.
Leonard, C.E., Brensinger, C.M., Nam, Y.H., Bilker, W.B., Barosso, G.M., Mangaali, M.J. & Hennessy, S. (2017). The quality of Medicaid and Medicare data obtained from CMS and its contractors: implications for pharmacoepidemiology. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), pp.1-7. Web.
Loftus, T. J., Tighe, P. J., Filiberto, A. C., Efron, P. A., Brakenridge, S. C., Mohr, A. M., Rashidi. P., Upchurch, G.R., & Bihorac, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making. JAMA Surgery, 155(2), 148-158. Web.
Sfantou, D. F., Laliotis, A., Patelarou, A. E., Sifaki-Pistolla, D., Matalliotakis, M., & Patelarou, E. (2017). Importance of leadership style towards quality of care measures in healthcare settings: a systematic review. Healthcare, 5(4), 73. Web.
Sontag-Padilla, L., Dunbar, M. S., Seelam, R., Kase, C. A., Setodji, C. M., & Stein, B. D. (2018). California community college faculty and staff help address student mental health issues. Rand health quarterly, 8(2). Web.
Van de Goor, I., Hämäläinen, R.-M., Syed, A., Juel Lau, C., Sandu, P., Spitters, H., Karlsson, L.E., Dulf, D., Valente, A., Castellani, T., & Aro, A. R. (2017). Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: Results from a study across six EU countries. Health Policy, 121(3), 273-281. Web.