Virtual and In-Person Relationships: Comparative Analysis

Introduction

Technology plays a mostly unnoticed role in shaping our daily lives’ thoughts, words, and actions. The underlying workings are concealed from the user in many systems since the excellent design is typically seamless. The algorithms that lie in the shadows of many computer systems have a significant impact (Sharabi, 2021). As a result of their ability to organize and convey information, algorithms may influence human behavior by advising what items to purchase or which people to add to social networks. There has been a significant shift in relationships where people now have the luxury of choosing between meeting people online or one-on-one.

There are different views on online dating where some are successful and have met their partners while some find it challenging to build relationships. Online dating is a location where connections may be made and broken at low cost to both parties, offline social norms are less evident, and the anonymity of the dating partners can offset gender preconceptions (Sumter & Vandenbosch, 2019). Men and women alike make use of these advantages while searching for a new companion, a brief fling, or perhaps the beginnings of a long-term relationship via online dating. This paper compares virtual and in-person relationships and how each differs in terms of characteristics discussed below.

Commitment

In online dating, one has no idea how a stranger will respond to the messages when connecting with them online. It is much easier to understand real emotions in the real world. In many cases, people can get away with lying online. Even the tiniest details of their body language reveal them when seen in person. People who meet online have a high probability of continuing in non-marital relationships than signing a formal marriage. People find it challenging to commit to a relationship with a single person when so many other possible people they can engage in romantically outside a committal (Dinh et al., 2018). Internet dating gives people far too many alternatives to select. Additionally, they are more likely to postpone making a long-term commitment to the person they eventually settle down with. Online daters know that if the current relationship does not work out, they can quickly check for other possible companions from dating sites or social media.

Time of Connecting

Secondly, internet connections take longer to build than offline interactions. Traditional offline relationships grow in a very different way when they are started online. In online dating, people create their profiles and then browse other people’s profiles to see whether they are a match (Cava et al., 2020). To start a connection with potential partners, e-mails and personal messages are sent and received. For a more extended period, internet partners communicate through text, private messaging, and phone calls. Thus, online relationships tend to be less mature and established than their counterparts in the real world in a given period. Whereas in face-to-face dating, one has to take time to build the courage to meet the person and go on dates, take time to talk to the person, and take time to know the person and see where the relationship will proceed.

Building Trust

Online daters have shown a tendency to build trust with their partners to counteract some of the negative connotations associated with online dating. Most online daters are worried about falsifying their personal information and false self-presentation of their potential mates (Sharabi, 2021). It is easier to build trust in physical dating since there is a view of first impression, and one can easily read the partner’s mood. To ensure that any discrepancies are discovered before becoming emotionally invested, internet daters spend extra time getting to know their potential mates. The lower rate of marriages compared to romantic partnerships among online daters may be due to the lack of exclusivity, commitment, and trust.

Frequency of Breakups

Online compared to their offline counterparts, and especially unmarried couples were more likely to split. Quality of connection significantly influences whether couples remain together, regardless of how long they have been married. Married couples choose to continue their marriages only if they felt their connection with their spouse satisfying and fulfilling and not because they had been together for an extended period (Dinh et al., 2018). Traditionally, people met their spouse in offline settings: work, school, social gatherings. Socialising creates mutual trust, which leads to relationship satisfaction. Unmarried romantic couples, on the other hand, relied heavily on the length of their relationships to determine whether or not they would continue together. Romantic partnerships take time to establish. Intimacy and trust are built over time when partners spend time together and get to know one other better. As a result, there is a more significant likelihood of remaining together in the long term.

Conclusion

People’s connections are the most important choices they make depending on whether they are made in online dating or physical dating. Dating websites’ algorithms significantly impact establishing relationships because of the many individuals who use them. Algorithmic elements such as ethnicity/race, self-presentation, and physical beauty in online dating affect people’s actions and choices. Physical dating allows for deep bonding and intimacy through participating in physical activities compared to online dating. More elements impact whether a couple will remain together that are not related to how they met. As for married couples, having a high-quality connection is critical to the length of their marriage. In contrast, for amorous unmarried couples, it is crucial to spend time cultivating their relationship to prevent splitting up.

References

Cava, M.-J., Buelga, S., Carrascosa, L., & Ortega-Barón, J. (2020). Relations among romantic myths, offline dating violence victimization and cyber dating violence victimization in adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1551. Web.

Dinh, R., Gildersleve, P., Blex, C., & Yasseri, T. (2018). Computational courtship: understanding the evolution of online dating through large-scale data analysis. Journal of Computational Social Science, Advance Online Publication. Web.

Fansher, A. K., & Eckinger, S. (2021). Tinder tales: An exploratory study of online dating users and their most interesting stories. Deviant Behavior, 42(9), 1194–1208. Web.

Sharabi, L. L. (2021). Exploring how beliefs about algorithms shape (offline) success in online dating: A two-wave longitudinal investigation. Communication Research, 48(7), 931–952. Web.

Sumter, S. R., & Vandenbosch, L. (2019). Dating gone mobile: Demographics and personality-based correlates of using smartphone-based dating applications among emerging adults. New Media & Society, 21(3), 655–673. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, December 4). Virtual and In-Person Relationships: Comparative Analysis. https://studycorgi.com/virtual-and-in-person-relationships-comparative-analysis/

Work Cited

"Virtual and In-Person Relationships: Comparative Analysis." StudyCorgi, 4 Dec. 2022, studycorgi.com/virtual-and-in-person-relationships-comparative-analysis/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Virtual and In-Person Relationships: Comparative Analysis'. 4 December.

1. StudyCorgi. "Virtual and In-Person Relationships: Comparative Analysis." December 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/virtual-and-in-person-relationships-comparative-analysis/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Virtual and In-Person Relationships: Comparative Analysis." December 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/virtual-and-in-person-relationships-comparative-analysis/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Virtual and In-Person Relationships: Comparative Analysis." December 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/virtual-and-in-person-relationships-comparative-analysis/.

This paper, “Virtual and In-Person Relationships: Comparative Analysis”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.