Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into people’s lives, influencing various areas. Aleksander (2017) notes that robots and AI may threaten humanity without adequate research and human interventions. Although he outlines the prospects for social changes and job losses due to automation, he also indicates the availability of upskilling and specialization opportunities.
Analysis of the Arguments
According to the author, there is a difference between artificial and algorithmic intelligence. While the author finds algorithms useful, he stresses that they cannot imitate human thinking and functioning. He states that “it becomes a challenge for humans of the ‘life-need’ category to use the inhabitants of the ‘algorithmic’ category to obtain an overall improvement in meeting ‘life needs’” (Aleksander, 2017, p. 8).
Besides, Aleksander shows that though robots can perform specific tasks at an intelligent level, they are still far behind human intelligence, which is deep and complex. He contends that grasping human intelligence requires more than just copying algorithms, since “cooperation of the two makes it effective” (Aleksander, 2017, p. 3). Hence, AI requires both artificial and algorithmic intelligence, as well as a human touch, for functional purposes.
According to the singularity argument, AI will outpace human intelligence in the future. Nevertheless, Aleksander expresses doubts about this belief. He confronts the recognition of merely boosting processing power as the basis for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
The author underlines that these discussions “confuse processing chip power with an understanding of how biological machinery leads to the intelligence of humans” (Aleksander, 2017, p. 2). Additionally, Aleksander supports the care for an approach to creating AGI and brilliant robots. For all the progress that AI and robotics have made, he also strongly reminds us of the limits of what technology can do now and of the complexity of the human mind.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Aleksander acknowledges the potential social changes that further development of AI may cause. The author notes the need for deeper research and a better understanding of the principles of human intelligence and cognitive processes before pursuing AGI. Discussions regarding unity can lead to false conclusions regarding similarities between artificial and human intelligence.
Therefore, it is essential to recognize their distinctive features and implement AI through cooperation among different types of intelligence. I believe that AIG and robots could facilitate routine activities in various fields. However, it requires the development of not only algorithmic intelligence but also cognitive aspects, which will help to make these technologies more human-like.
Reference
Aleksander, I. (2017). Partners of humans: a realistic assessment of the role of robots in the foreseeable future. Journal of Information Technology, 32(1), 1-9.