Bioethics of Medical Marijuana: Kantianism vs. Utilitarianism

The Bioethical Issue

The global society is facing numerous issues such as abortion, gay marriage, and medical marijuana. Bioethics is “a powerful field that encourages people to deal with different controversial issues” (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2011, p. 36). The issue of medical marijuana is a topic that matters a lot to me. Some health practitioners support the use of marijuana for medical purposes.

Bioethicists should use the best ideas in order to deal with the controversies associated with medical marijuana. I personally believe that marijuana is a dangerous drug. For instance, marijuana “causes psychological addiction” (Pfeifer, 2011, p. 342). The drug has been associated with lung cancer. The American society promotes the best strategies in order to deal with this drug. That being the case, marijuana remains a prohibited drug in many parts of the world.

Kantianism

Kantianism is a useful ethical theory that can be used to address this issue. According to the theory, people should focus on the best duties and obligations. This theory can encourage medical practitioners to support the best social behaviors. According to the theory, citizens should not use marijuana because it is illegal (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2011). Medical practitioners should focus on the best practices in order to protect their patients from the negative effects of this drug.

Utilitarianism

On the other hand, the utilitarian theory deals with the ethical issues associated with medical marijuana. To begin with, utilitarianism seeks “to maximise human happiness” (Pfeifer, 2011, p. 348). This ethical theory focuses on happiness for the greatest number of people (Pfeifer, 2011). The “decision to prohibit the use of medical marijuana infringes upon the rights of many patients” (Pfeifer, 2011, p. 341). The “use of medical marijuana will improve the lives of terminally ill patients” (Pfeifer, 2011, p. 354).

Reference List

Pfeifer, D. (2011). Smoking Gun: The Moral and Legal Struggle for Medical Marijuana. Touro Law Review, 27(1), 339-378.

Thiroux, J., & Krasemann, K. (2011). Ethics: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Pearson.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2020, May 15). Bioethics of Medical Marijuana: Kantianism vs. Utilitarianism. https://studycorgi.com/bioethics-the-use-of-marijuana-for-medical-purposes/

Work Cited

"Bioethics of Medical Marijuana: Kantianism vs. Utilitarianism." StudyCorgi, 15 May 2020, studycorgi.com/bioethics-the-use-of-marijuana-for-medical-purposes/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2020) 'Bioethics of Medical Marijuana: Kantianism vs. Utilitarianism'. 15 May.

1. StudyCorgi. "Bioethics of Medical Marijuana: Kantianism vs. Utilitarianism." May 15, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/bioethics-the-use-of-marijuana-for-medical-purposes/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Bioethics of Medical Marijuana: Kantianism vs. Utilitarianism." May 15, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/bioethics-the-use-of-marijuana-for-medical-purposes/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2020. "Bioethics of Medical Marijuana: Kantianism vs. Utilitarianism." May 15, 2020. https://studycorgi.com/bioethics-the-use-of-marijuana-for-medical-purposes/.

This paper, “Bioethics of Medical Marijuana: Kantianism vs. Utilitarianism”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.