Comparison of Financial Reports of the Companies
The financial position of company A is stronger than that of company B. The total assets of Company A at the end of 2011 amounted to $1,176,027,002 while for Company A totaled $238,968. Similarly, revenue for company A was greater than that of company B. In 2011, Company A had a net income amounting to $164,668,228 while the net income of company B amounted to 53,291. On the face of it, it can be seen that the financial performance for company A is greater than that of company B. Ratio analysis may reveal contrary results. DuPont analysis will be carried out to compare the financial position of the company. The analysis focuses on the return on assets and returns on equity of a company. Return on assets shows how effectively a firm uses assets to generate sales (Siddiqui 2005; Holmes & Sugden 2008). It is a ratio of net income to total assets. Return on equity measures how effectively the management of the organization uses the shareholders’ equity to generate revenue (Vance 2003). DuPont analysis of the two companies is shown in the tables below.
Company A
Company B
Even though the net income reveals that the profitability of company A is greater than that of company B, the profitability ratios give a contrary result. The return on assets for company B is greater than that of company A. Return on assets for both companies increased from 2010 to 2011. Also, the return on equity for company B is greater than for company A for the two-year period. However, the return on equity for company A increased from 2010 to 2011 while that of company B declined. Based on the ratios, it is evident that company B is more efficient in using assets and equity to generate net income than company A (Collier 2009; Fraser 2009; Haber 2004). Therefore, it is more profitable.
The Table Below Shows Vertical Analysis Report for Company A
Balance Sheet
Income Statement
The Table Below Shows Vertical Analysis Report for Company B
Balance Sheet
Income Statement
Summary
DuPont analysis reveals that Company B is more profitable and efficient in managing assets and equity than Company B. This can be attributed to the fact that Company A has a high ratio of total to equity total assets of 87.33% in 2011. The company has a low ratio of total liabilities to total assets of 12.65% as of 2011. For company B, the ratio of total equity to total assets amounted to 56.93% in 2011 while the ratio of total liabilities to total assets was 46.07% in 2011. From the comparison, it is evident that Company B has higher leverage than Company A. This implies that the amount of net income from Company B is distributed to a large number of shareholders than in Company A thus yielding a high return on assets and return on equity (Brigham & Joel 2009; Eugene & Michael 2009). It is worth noting that the net profit margin for company A (16%) is greater than that of company B (13%). The gross profit margin for company A (35%) is greater than that of company B (48%). This reveals that company A is efficient in managing operating costs while company B is efficient in managing the cost of sales (McLaney & Atrill 2008; Atrill 2009).
References
Atrill, P. 2009, Financial management for decision-makers, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Harlow.
Brigham, F & Joel, F 2009, Fundamentals of financial management, South-Western Cengage Learning, USA.
Collier, P. 2009, Accounting for managers, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, London.
Eugene, F & Michael, C 2009, Financial management theory and practice, South-Western Cengage Learning, USA.
Fraser, G 2009, Decision accounting, Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford.
Haber, R 2004, Accounting demystified, American Management Association, New York.
Holmes, G & Sugden, 2008, Interpreting company reports, Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Harlow.
McLaney, E & Atrill, P 2008, Financial accounting for decision-makers, Prentice Hall Europe, Harlow.
Siddiqui, A. 2005, Managerial economics and financial analysis, New Age International (P) Limited, New Delhi.
Vance, D 2003, Financial analysis and decision making: Tools and techniques to solve, McGraw-Hill books, United States.