Experimental Intervention and Validity

When applying a scientific method to the scenario, it is possible to offer null and research hypotheses. A null hypothesis is as follows: An experimental intervention does not lead to a statistically significant increase in students’ motivation to participate in discussions. Since a research hypothesis represents the expected outcome of a study, the following statement can be used: An experimental intervention significantly increases students’ motivation to participate in discussions.

Multiple designs can be used to test the hypotheses, meaning that it is necessary to choose the best option. Since the goal is to assess the effectiveness of a specific intervention, an experiment should be performed. The Pretest-Posttest Control-Group Design is not appropriate because the scenario does not have any information regarding pretest measurement. According to Skidmore (2008), the Solomon Four-Group Design is not suitable because it requires four treatment groups, while the scenario only offers two groups. Finally, the Posttest-Only Control-Group Design seems the best option because it includes random sampling, experimental and control groups, and post-intervention measurement (Skidmore, 2008). This information demonstrates that the third approach should be used to test the hypotheses.

It is necessary to comment on how one can mitigate the threats to internal validity. Firstly, a specific event that is not related to the intervention can occur before measurement, which can affect the students’ motivation (Skidmore, 2008). It is possible to address this threat by reducing the time between an intervention implementation and measurement. Secondly, an instrumentation threat can emerge if the researchers modify a dependent variable (Skidmore, 2008). It is possible to mitigate this condition by ensuring that variables remain stable after the experiment has started.

Finally, it is necessary to apply ethical principles to the suggested research. All the individuals should express a voluntary consent to participate in the experiment. Random sampling implies that the participants will be protected from any discrimination. That is why it is possible to conclude that this type of research respects individual rights and addresses cultural issues. Consequently, one can assume that the suggested study satisfies ethical standards.

Reference

Skidmore, S. (2008). Experimental design and some threats to experimental validity: A primer. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, May 25). Experimental Intervention and Validity. https://studycorgi.com/experimental-intervention-and-validity/

Work Cited

"Experimental Intervention and Validity." StudyCorgi, 25 May 2023, studycorgi.com/experimental-intervention-and-validity/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'Experimental Intervention and Validity'. 25 May.

1. StudyCorgi. "Experimental Intervention and Validity." May 25, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/experimental-intervention-and-validity/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Experimental Intervention and Validity." May 25, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/experimental-intervention-and-validity/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "Experimental Intervention and Validity." May 25, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/experimental-intervention-and-validity/.

This paper, “Experimental Intervention and Validity”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.