It is important to note that Michel Foucault’s concept discusses the emergence of the concept of knowledge and its relationship to power. Thus, the author argues that the impetus for the emergence of knowledge comes from the upper circles of power (Fruhling, n.d). This is because it is important for the authorities to establish certain narratives in society that should be “true” for people. Accordingly, scientific research is often financed and authorized by the authorities in order to establish certain factors that are necessary for the formation of policy positions. Thus, Michel Foucault created a conception that explains the close relationship between power and knowledge (Fruhling, n.d). However, the author does not argue that the relationship between power and knowledge is built only in a top-down system. Knowledge can also influence power and decision-makers. At the same time, the relationships between different institutions also have an impact. For example, when there is a competition between different educational institutions to introduce novelties into science. Therefore, these lateral relations also stimulate the development of knowledge.
Moreover, Michel Foucault examines the relationship between truth and influence using the example of knowledge. Therefore, the author argues that the authorities support knowledge and discoveries that are necessary for their political conception. As a result, society adapts true knowledge that is politically beneficial to the ruling circles. Moreover, the influence of the authorities is so important that oligarchs can determine the people who will be engaged in science (Fruhling, n.d). Therefore, the author comes to the conclusion that people with power have the power to determine the main priorities of science or culture through the system of influence on them. Thus, with the help of the concept of knowledge, it is possible to defend power interests and establish them in society.
Reference
Fruhling, Z.(n.d). Foucault’s concept of “Power/Knowledge” explained. Web.