Human Resource Implications
Potential Issues with Personnel
Human resource management (HRM) plays two critical functions in risk management that help large organizations integrate risk management into their daily operations. First, people can mess up in different ways, such as a lack of personnel, poor output, reluctance to take on more responsibility, or a key employee resigning two months after a year-long training program (Aust et al., 2020).
Second, risk management is all about people (Azizi et al., 2021). They can creatively address problems and go above and beyond for the firm (Duong et al., 2019). People can also alter their roles to avoid bottlenecks or persuade a highly competent acquaintance to join the organization.
Human Resources in Production, Financing, and Promotion
To be effective, human resources must be integrated into the business’s day-to-day operations. It, too, becomes clear that humans play a role in or impact every facet of production, financing, and promotion (Carnevale & Hatak, 2020). Humans are responsible for every step of the process, from making the ultimate choice to implementing it and evaluating its results (Anwar & Abdullah, 2021). The management team and manufacturing, finance, and marketing workers will experience less stress and risk if their worries are removed.
Employee-Related Risks
Human resources professionals at large companies regularly have to think about various risk management challenges. They start with the idea that the difficulties inherent in hiring employees are a problem for any business (Malik et al., 2020). Turnover, burnout, interactions with co-workers, workplace conflicts, harassment, and apathy can all have a chilling effect on productivity and morale, hurting the company’s bottom line (Brocal et al., 2019).
Risks from Workplace Changes
Workplace changes introduce novel hazards such as remote/hybrid employment options. While this may seem appealing initially, it can lead to communication breakdowns and feelings of isolation among workers if they are not given enough opportunities for face-to-face interaction (Rasool et al., 2019). The result could be less enthusiasm and output from workers.
Managing Cybersecurity and Data Privacy
Each HR department in a large company usually takes cyber security and data privacy seriously as part of their regular duties. Companies often have a privacy policy in place and manage the acquisition and storage of employee data securely and ethically (Davidescu et al., 2020). Workers accessing private client information are also held to a high standard. Enterprises risk legal action and reputational harm when customer data is compromised due to security lapses or improper use (Piwowar-Sulej, 2021). Thus, HR is responsible for ensuring the data is secure and appropriately handled in managing risks within the day-to-day operations.
Organizational Culture Implications
Integration of Risk Management and Business Goals
Implications for corporate culture, when risk management is effectively integrated into day-to-day operations, guarantee to align with overall business goals and determine if/when cultural shifts are necessary. Cultures inside organizations are apt to evolve during their existence (Arif et al., 2019). Changes in strategy and the environment in which a company usually operates prompt such developments (Hamouche, 2021). Several large businesses, for instance, have increased their emphasis on diversity and inclusion due to the recent social justice campaigns (Graham et al., 2022). The boards of directors at the organizations with the best risk management routinely debate strategies for encouraging the necessary corporate culture among remote employees.
Culture-Building Efforts and Communication Channels
The effects of organizational culture examine the effects of the organization’s culture-building efforts and communication channels on a regular business. Changing a company’s culture and getting people to adopt new habits over time calls for planning, action, and evaluation (Gregurec et al., 2021). Internal communications can play a crucial role in reinforcing desired behaviors, which is crucial to changing the organization’s culture and establishing accountability for how it is conveyed and lived. For instance, the Board might review the onboarding process and the response of upper management to violations of business principles every day (Sugiarti et al., 2021). This demonstrates how risk management-focused boards prioritize discussions on promoting actions consistent with the organization’s desired culture.
Assessment and Metrics for Cultural Impact
Organizational culture has far-reaching implications, including the need to monitor the impact of cultural change and performance on day-to-day operations. Just half of the board members have faith in management’s reports concerning culture and conduct-related hazards (Obrenovic et al., 2020). Governing boards led by industry experts are more proactive. In contrast to the 40% of firms Pederson (2021) classifies as developing, 80% of boards of organizations that lead on risk management address the metrics needed to identify talent and cultural risks (Lobschat et al., 2021).
Surveys and Analyses of Cultural Trends
The most efficient and forward-thinking boards conduct surveys of employees’ risk perceptions and attitudes, as well as conduct in-depth analyses of cultural trends, benchmarking against other organizations or industry norms, and examinations of emerging patterns in employee behavior (Duchek et al., 2019). This ensures that direct and indirect cultural measures are reviewed daily, such as employee pulse surveys, onboarding and leave interviews, and other customer surveys.
Role of the Board in Cultural Reinforcement
The organizational culture impact ensures sufficient time to discuss culture in the boardroom for large organizations’ daily activities. Due to the pandemic and the fact that remote workers are physically separated from their colleagues in the office, many large companies spend considerable time stressing the significance of culture (Obrenovic et al., 2020). The Board reviews every board decision to determine whether it reinforces or undermines the desired culture (Lobschat et al., 2021). Furthermore, the Board plays a vital role in establishing the tone at the top. It can demonstrate a commitment to the value of culture by frequently examining its composition and dynamics.
Good Practice Within Pepsi Company
Human Resource Management Techniques
Prosperous businesses’ human resource management techniques align with the company’s structure. Human resource management is a set of procedures designed to improve a company’s ability to control its workplace climate (Tan Pham et al., 2019). Employees, rivals, supervisors, journalists, business owners, consumers, and backers all comprise the internal environment (Rizvi & Garg, 2022). Hence, Pepsi Corporation has extensively studied the company’s internal and external environments and established a people management strategy.
Communication and Feedback
PepsiCo’s goal centers on open lines of communication and frequent feedback sessions between management and staff. The company’s vision about the importance of performance contracts in maximizing output is unambiguous (Shanjabin & Oyshi, 2021). Performance contracts are useful tools for evaluating workers’ contributions annually (Warrick & Gardner, 2021).
Incentives and Fair Treatment
Additionally, the company identifies those employees who merit financial and non-financial incentives following an evaluation process (Jallow, 2021). PepsiCo recognizes that treating people fairly is the greatest way to guarantee customer pleasure (Cho et al., 2021). The thinking behind this is that a happy workforce translates into satisfied clients (Tharchen et al., 2020). As this is taking place, PepsiCo focuses on Coca-Cola, its main rival since its foundation.
Equity in Incentives and Policies
PepsiCo uses financial and non-financial incentives to keep its staff engaged and committed. The HR department checks to ensure its policies are uniformly applied and equitable for all workers (Warrick & Gardner, 2021). This practice exists to forestall discrimination claims based on race, religion, sexual orientation, and other protected categories. One of HR’s main responsibilities is cultivating a professional atmosphere (Cho et al., 2021). For this to happen, workers must value their affiliation with PepsiCo.
Cultural Adaptation and Global Strategy
As a multinational corporation that produces a wide variety of goods, PepsiCo justifiably merits first-rate human resource policies and procedures. PepsiCo is headquartered in New York, but the company employs people from all over the world. Due to this, it requires people management approaches that are applicable in a variety of cultural contexts. In 1965, Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay joined to establish PepsiCo, and since then, PepsiCo has had to develop a human resources organization that works for both firms (Qian et al., 2022). The merger was a wise move that would help the business succeed.
Diverse Demographics and People Management
Among the many things that PepsiCo produces are sodas, diet sodas, water, syrups, candies, and sweeteners. There are a variety of demographics served by these products. Dealing with customers, workers, the press, and competitors from different walks of life is only possible with a solid people management strategy (Sharma & Lenka, 2021).
Training and Performance Reviews
An effective people management strategy will ensure that the company’s investments in production and marketing bear fruit (Zhang, 2019). The time it takes for PepsiCo to open a new location directly results from the company’s policy of accommodating the local culture (Wall-Andrews et al., 2022). Part of a successful company’s culture is fostering win-win partnerships for everyone involved. This lessens the effect of maintaining the status quo on productivity in the workplace.
Compensation and Employee Retention
PepsiCo’s major rival is Coca-Cola. Training and performance reviews build a strong team capable of competing successfully. Training is done both at the beginning of employment and later on (Kalinová & Tlustý, 2021). Errors at work can be minimized, and productivity can be boosted by doing this. In addition, PepsiCo is known for providing generous compensation to its employees (Quan, 2020). The departure of trained individuals from PepsiCo would be unfortunate as training is a transitional period.
To prevent this from happening, the corporation implements salary raises for employees yearly (Struckell et al., 2022). Employees can get more than just monetary compensation from an evaluation at their place of employment, as they can also receive bonuses, time off, higher positions, and even promotions. Due to these monetary and non-monetary incentives and packages, PepsiCo can keep its staff largely.
Recommendations for PepsiCo
I have two recommendations on how PepsiCo can increase productivity among its staff. The first is to put clients’ needs first through training and education. Providing a sales college to teach workers how to satisfy customers better is one strategy for bolstering the workforce. Through various coaching programs, sales academies teach workers how to boost sales and go above and beyond for customers (Sehrawat, 2019).
Another way to boost employee happiness is to help them better understand how their work contributes to PepsiCo’s overall mission and vision (Raza et al., 2019). If businesses consider their workers’ aspirations, they can succeed better. Everyone wins when leaders support and encourage workers to develop professionally and personally.
Reference List
Anwar, G. and Abdullah, N.N. (2021) ‘The impact of Human Resource Management Practice on organizational performance,’ International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(1), pp. 35–47. Web.
Arif, S., Zainudin, Z. and Hamid, A. (2019) ‘Influence of leadership, organizational culture, work motivation, and job satisfaction of performance principles of senior high school in Medan City,’ Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal) : Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(4), pp. 239–254. Web.
Aust, I., Matthews, B. and Muller-Camen, M. (2020) ‘Common good HRM: a paradigm shift in sustainable hrm?,’Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), p. 100705. Web.
Azizi, M.R. et al. (2021) ‘Innovative human resource management strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic narrative review approach,’ Heliyon, 7(6). Web.
Brocal, F. et al. (2019) ‘Emerging risk management in industry 4.0: an approach to improve organizational and human performance in the Complex Systems,’ Complexity, 2019, pp. 1–13. Web.
Carnevale, J.B. and Hatak, I. (2020) ‘Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: implications for human resource management,’ Journal of Business Research, 116, pp. 183–187. Web.
Cho, C.H. et al. (2021) ‘Internationalization and CSR reporting: evidence from US companies and their Polish subsidiaries,’ Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(7), pp. 135–162. Web.
Davidescu, A.A.M. et al. (2020) ‘Work flexibility, job satisfaction, and job performance among Romanian employees—implications for sustainable human resource management,’ Sustainability, 12(15), p. 6086. Web.
Duchek, S., Raetze, S. and Scheuch, I. (2019) ‘The role of diversity in organizational resilience: A theoretical framework,’ Business Research, 13(2), pp. 387–423. Web.
Duong, T.T. et al. (2019) ‘A global review of farmers’ perceptions of agricultural risks and risk management strategies,’ Agriculture, 9(1), p. 10. Web.
Graham, J.R. et al. (2022) ‘Corporate culture: evidence from the field,’ Journal of Financial Economics, 146(2), pp. 552–593. Web.
Gregurec, I., Tomičić Furjan, M. and Tomičić-Pupek, K. (2021) ‘The impact of covid-19 on sustainable business models in smes,’ Sustainability, 13(3), p. 1098. Web.
Hamouche, S. (2021) ‘Human resource management and the COVID-19 crisis: implications, challenges, opportunities, and future organizational directions,’ Journal of Management & Organization, pp. 1–16. Web.
Jallow, A. (2021) ‘A strategic case study on PepsiCo,’ SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. Web.
Kalinová, E. and Tlustý, M. (2021) ‘An analysis of the time series of the PepsiCo, inc. (PEP) share price and a prediction of its development,’ SHS Web of Conferences, 91. Web.
Lobschat, L. et al. (2021) ‘Corporate digital responsibility,’ Journal of Business Research, 122, pp. 875–888. Web.
Malik, S.Y. et al. (2020) ‘Pathways towards sustainability in organizations: empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management practices and green intellectual Capital,’ Sustainability, 12(8), p. 3228. Web.
Obrenovic, B. et al. (2020) ‘Sustaining enterprise operations and productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic: enterprise effectiveness and sustainability model,’ Sustainability, 12(15), pp. 1–27. Web.
Pederson, K. (2021) Four ways boards can govern culture to reduce risk, EY. EY. Web.
Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2021) ‘Human resources development as an element of sustainable HRM – with the focus on production engineers,’ Journal of Cleaner Production, 278. Web.
Qian, D., Dargusch, P. and Hill, G. (2022) ‘Carbon management behind the ambitious pledge of net zero carbon emission—a case study of Pepsico,’ Sustainability, 14(4), p. 2171. Web.
Quan, J. (2020) ‘The trend of PepsiCo by comparing PepsiCo’s financial reports in 2018 to 2019 based on Harvard analytical framework,’ Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Modern Management and Education Technology (MMET 2020) [Preprint]. Web.
Rasool, S.F. et al. (2019) ‘How human resource management practices translate into sustainable organizational performance: the mediating role of product, process and knowledge innovation,’ Psychology Research and Behaviour Management, Volume 12, pp. 1009–1025. Web.
Raza, M., Frooghi, R. and Shah, S.abbas (2019) ‘Determinants of brand loyalty in the Cola Industry of Pakistan: A case study of Pepsi Cola,’ Sukkur IBA Journal of Management and Business, 6(1), pp. 12–33. Web.
Rizvi, Y.S. and Garg, R. (2022) ‘Environmental sustainability performance: a study of the role of green human resource management and other green internal intellectual capital components,’ International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 16(1), p. 65. Web.
Sehrawat, S. (2019) “PepsiCo’s Sustainable Strategies,” Journal of Management, 6(2). Web.
Shanjabin, S. and Oyshi, A.H. (2021) ‘The comparative analysis of FMCG enterprises’ vision, mission, and core values focusing on strategic human resources,’ International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 3(2), pp. 115–128. Web.
Sharma, S. and Lenka, U. (2021) ‘On the shoulders of giants: uncovering key themes of organizational unlearning research in mainstream management journals,’ Review of Managerial Science, 16(6), pp. 1599–1695. Web.
Struckell, E. et al. (2022) ‘Strategic choice in times of stagnant growth and uncertainty: an institutional theory and organizational change perspective,’ Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, p. 121839. Web.
Sugiarti, E., Finatariani, E. and Rahman, Y.T. (2021) ‘Earning cultural values as a strategic step to improve employee performance,’ Scientific Journal of Reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 4(1), pp. 221–230. Web.
Tan Pham, N., Tučková, Z. and Phu Thi Phan, Q. (2019) ‘Sectoral analysis of the effectiveness of bank risk capital in the Visegrad Group countries,’ Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(3), pp. 446–465. Web.
Tharchen, T., Garud, R. and Henn, R.L. (2020) ‘Design as an interactive boundary object,’ Journal of Organization Design, 9(1). Web.
Wall-Andrews, C. et al. (2022) ‘The state of diversity among leadership roles within Canada’s largest arts and cultural institutions,’ Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 41(9), pp. 30–46. Web.
Warrick, D.D. and Gardner, D.G. (2021) ‘Leaders build cultures: action steps for leaders to build successful organizational cultures,’ Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 18(1). Web.
Zhang, Z. (2019) ‘Risk analysis of two leader Drink Company: Pepsico and Coca-Cola,’ Asian Business Research, 4(3), p. 42. Web.