NASA and Space Colonization

Sartipi, F., Palaskar, K., Ergin, A., & Rajakaruna, U. (2020). Viable construction technology for habitation on Mars: Fused deposition modelling. Journal of Construction Materials, 1(2), 1-7. Web.

The research focuses on proposing the Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) as the most practical construction process implementable on Mars during colonization. The source is credible because it is an academic research article published in a reputable journal. The authors’ credibility is rooted in the fact that they are experts in computing engineering and mathematics from the Institute of Construction Materials. The source will contribute by showing the plausibility of practical measures undertaken by NASA for space colonization purposes.

Quote: “NASA’s plan about creating a livable environment on Moon prior to starting off the Martian mission is a wise approach towards understanding the structural behavior of housing in extra-terrestrial conditions. Nonetheless, additive manufacturing is the most viable construction technology in terms of productivity, speed, and cost” (Sartipi et al., 2020, p. 6).

Zubrin, R. (2018). The economic viability of mars colonization. In T. James (Ed.), Deep space commodities: Exploration, production and trading (pp. 159–180). Palgrave Macmillan.

The main message of the source is about a wide range of opportunities opened by space colonization viewed from an economic perspective. The chapter is credible because it is academic, and it is authored by a space expert. The particular author of interest in the book is Robert Zubrin, who is an advocate for the human exploration of Mars as well as an aerospace engineer. The chapter will contribute to the research by providing evidence from expert assessments about the economic validity of space colonization.

Quote: “while Mars may lack any cash material directly exportable to Earth, its orbital elements and other physical parameters give it a unique positional advantage that will allow it to act as a keystone, supporting extractive activities in the asteroid belt and elsewhere in the solar system” (Zubrin, 2018, p. 159).

Space Colonization Sources: Cons

Wells-Jensen, S., Miele, J. A., & Bohney, B. (2019). An alternate vision for colonization. Futures, 110, 50-53. Web.

The core message of the source is that space colonization efforts should adhere to universal design principles in order not to discriminate against people with disabilities. The source is credible because it is a journal article publication, and its authors are reputable experts in sociology. The article will contribute to the research by revealing the key and inherent flaws of colonization from a sociological perspective.

Quote: “limiting crew selection to able-bodied candidates represents a systematic disadvantage to the colony” (Wells-Jensen et al., 2019, p. 50).

Wojtowicz, T., & Szocik, K. (2021). Democracy or what? Political system on the planet Mars after its colonization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120619. Web.

The main message of the source is about the plausible and probable political system of a future colony on Mars, which is likely to be either technocracy or direct democracy. The source and its authors are credible since this is a journal article and academic publication written by political experts in the field. The contribution of the material to the research is that it will show the inapplicability of the existing political systems within the context of space colonization.

Quote: “while there are possible a couple of options strongly affected by not-predictable environmental and social constraints, the most optimal scenario would be direct democracy or technocracy” (Wojtowicz & Szocik, 2021, p. 120619).

References

Sartipi, F., Palaskar, K., Ergin, A., & Rajakaruna, U. (2020). Viable construction technology for habitation on Mars: Fused deposition modelling. Journal of Construction Materials, 1(2), 1-7. Web.

Wells-Jensen, S., Miele, J. A., & Bohney, B. (2019). An alternate vision for colonization. Futures, 110, 50-53. Web.

Wojtowicz, T., & Szocik, K. (2021). Democracy or what? Political system on the planet Mars after its colonization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120619. Web.

Zubrin, R. (2018). The economic viability of mars colonization. In T. James (Ed.), Deep space commodities: Exploration, production and trading (pp. 159–180). Palgrave Macmillan.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2023, June 17). NASA and Space Colonization. https://studycorgi.com/nasa-and-space-colonization/

Work Cited

"NASA and Space Colonization." StudyCorgi, 17 June 2023, studycorgi.com/nasa-and-space-colonization/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2023) 'NASA and Space Colonization'. 17 June.

1. StudyCorgi. "NASA and Space Colonization." June 17, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/nasa-and-space-colonization/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "NASA and Space Colonization." June 17, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/nasa-and-space-colonization/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2023. "NASA and Space Colonization." June 17, 2023. https://studycorgi.com/nasa-and-space-colonization/.

This paper, “NASA and Space Colonization”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.