Introduction
Tesla is one of the most costly companies in the world, but it remains the most valuable carmaker. Tesla Motors, Inc.’s operations strategy procedures meet the standards in the ten strategic options for maximum effectiveness in all areas of the vehicle and electrical solutions business. The execution of the operations strategy is also supported and dependent on the company’s technological innovation aspirations. The company’s international reach is available to Tesla’s operational management. Tesla, Inc. has a management strategy that encourages long-term company success. A corporation’s organizational architecture is the design and strategy that determines the communication patterns between its parts. This work was written with the aim of studying the concepts of management and organizational structure of the Tesla company.
Specific Management Concepts
The operations strategy concepts of Tesla Motors, Inc. achieve the requirements in the ten strategic choices for optimal efficiency in all sectors of the automobile and electricity solutions industry. Different corporate strategy areas need management teams to adhere to quality standards in order to promote organizational efficiency, organizational effectiveness, and enhanced efficiency (Dyer, Godfrey, Jensen, Bryce, 2017). In this business research case, the point of these concepts in improving performance and productivity is critical to Tesla’s global development aspirations (Johnson, Scholes, Whittington, Regn_r, Angwin, 2017). The operations strategies performance is also supported and dependent on the company’s technology innovation ambitions.
The fundamental goal of this addresses this strategic decision area in order to meet the quality preferences of customers. This strategic point is discussed by Tesla Inc. through frequent quality inspections, quality improvement activities, and competitive analysis of the automotive and industrial solutions markets (Hitt, Ireland, Hoskisson, 2019). Furthermore, the firm is constantly improving its goods and processes in order to meet high quality and productivity criteria. For instance, Tesla’s management teams undertake quality evaluations and apply improvements to production methods on a regular basis.
The operations managerial decision area for process and capacities design contributes to business systems and associated investments, assets, and standards. Tesla, Inc. incorporates automation to address this issue. For example, the firm automates production processes while still allowing for human participation. This situation enables Tesla to attain high productivity in the automotive and industrial solutions industries through organizational effectiveness (Luthans & Doh, 2018). Furthermore, this area of business management impacts and is impacted by Tesla Inc.’s corporate culture.
The management considers logistics and proximity to markets, commodities, and suppliers. In terms of resources, Tesla’s operational managers can make use of the company’s global network. Suppliers in the United States, Europe, and Asia, for instance, offer some of the essential aspects of the industry’s electric autos and other goods. The aim of this strategic resolution area planning is the availability of an actual human resource department. Tesla, Inc. achieves this goal by employing a competitive compensation plan to recruit productive and capable employees. This strategy is critical in a market where many organizations compete for top-tier human capital.
This decision area of operations management takes into account decision making, costs, and quality assurance. Inventory choices at Tesla are based on operations management concepts that prioritize quality. Managers, for example, demand that warehouse holding not have an impact on the quality of components used in the industry’s electric cars. Tesla’s operations strategic plan, on the other hand, includes just-in-time inventories for select materials in order to maximize efficiency and decrease inventory expenses.
Background Information
Tesla, Inc. is an American automaker and sustainable energy firm. Tesla designs and produces electric vehicles, electrical energy storage systems ranging from residential to grid-scale, photovoltaic arrays and solar roof tiles, as well as other goods and services. Tesla is one of the most expensive organizations in the world, and it is still the most valued automaker (Ahmad & Khan, 2019). Tesla typically enables competitors to license its technology, claiming that it wishes to assist competitors in accelerating the world’s usage of renewable energy sources (Alghalith, 2018). This licensing method includes conditions under which the recipient agrees not to sue Tesla for patent infringement or directly copy its designs.
Tesla Organizational Structure
Tesla, Inc. has an administrative system that promotes long-term corporate success. The organizational or corporate structure of a corporation is the design and strategy that specifies the patterns of interactions among its components. In this Tesla business research example, the organizational structure is traditional, reflecting the company’s management emphasis and control, as well as its regional operational development in the worldwide market (Hettich & Müller-Stewens, 2017). Tesla Inc., for instance, employs its business structure to permit substantial organizational management as a producer of electric autos, batteries, solar panels, and associated transport and energy services. Elon Musk’s management performance can be determined by the company structure’s potential to distribute and assist the adoption of new business expansion and improvement activities. Through its organizational structure, the corporation maximizes its capacity to execute new mechanisms for managing operational operations and goals. Tesla’s management accounting is reliant on the business material’s ability to accommodate necessary moves and deployments.
Tesla has a practical or unitary-form management structure; the unitary-form system focuses on company function as the significant differentiator. The corporation, for example, has a structural set of people for development and another for sales and support. Tesla has several structural traits with other forms of corporate structures, albeit to a lesser level. The categorization based on business function is the most crucial element in this firm analysis instance.
The function-based organization in Tesla’s wide variety of organizations is the most notable feature of its corporate structure. This structure includes functional teams or offices in charge of domestic and foreign activities. This characteristic is common in conventional corporate entities where corporations strive to maintain rigorous management control over their actions. Tesla, Inc.’s company governance is centralized; the emphasis of centralization is management control of the whole company via choices generated by a central group or team (Xu, 2020). In this instance, the leaders of the global hierarchy’s offices comprise the corporation’s primary headquarters, which has direct authority over overall activities. Tesla’s local or abroad offices have little flexibility in this corporate structure. The majority of decisions regarding international operations are made at the company office.
The amount of geographical or other sorts of divisions in Tesla Inc.’s automobile industry is a feature of the corporate structure. These sections are utilized to execute various plans and promotional strategies, as well as to arrange financial records and reports. The primary divisions of the company’s company structure are Automotive and Industrial Production and Storage (Todorovic, Simic, Kumar, 2017). These distinctions are minor in comparison to the organization’s feature architecture.
In terms of efficient management control of global activities, Tesla, Inc. has advantages from its company structure. Another advantage is the simplicity with which new tactics may be implemented throughout the firm. Furthermore, the regional divisions enable financial reporting and research, as well as laying the groundwork for future regional economic integration of strategies and planning in the global automobile industry. The organization has established a corporation to control the growth of comparative advantages effectively (Wang, Duan, Liu, 2021). The conservatism of Tesla’s organizational structure inhibits the organization’s ability to react quickly. Global concentration, for instance, is a vital component that hinders the independent capacity of abroad offices to respond promptly to difficulties they encounter in their various regional markets. To remedy this shortcoming, it is suggested that Tesla Inc. alter its organization’s ability to raise the amount of autonomy of its abroad operations.
Conclusion
Tesla employs a practical or unitary-form organizational structure; the unitary-form approach emphasizes industrial company as a critical distinction. The most noticeable aspect of Tesla’s company structure is the function-based structure in its vast range of entities. This organization consists of functional groups or departments in charge of local and international activity. In this organizational structure, Tesla’s local or international offices have minimal freedom. The bulk of overseas business decisions is being made in the business office. To address this deficiency, it is proposed that Tesla Inc. modify its institution’s ability to increase the level of autonomy of its international operations.
Reference List
Ahmad, S., & Khan, M. 2019. ‘Tesla: Disruptor or Sustaining Innovator’. Journal of Case Research, 10(1).
Alghalith, N. 2018. ‘Tesla: innovation with information technology’. International Journal of Business Research and Information Technology, 5(1), pp. 37-51.
Dyer, J. H., Godfrey, P., Jensen, R., & Bryce, D. 2017. Strategic Management: concepts and cases. John Wiley & Sons.
Hettich, E., & Müller-Stewens, G. 2017. ‘Tesla motors. business model configuration’.
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. 2019. Strategic management: Concepts and Cases: Competitiveness and globalization. Cengage Learning.
Johnson, G., Scholes, K., Whittington, R., Regn_r, P., & Angwin, D. 2017. Fundamentals of strategy. Pearson UK.
Luthans, F., & Doh, J. P. 2018. International Management: Culture, strategy, and behavior. McGraw-Hill.
Todorovic, M., Simic, M., & Kumar, A. 2017. ‘Managing transition to electric and autonomous vehicles’. Procedia computer science, 112, pp. 2335-2344.
Wang, J., Duan, Y., & Liu, G. 2021. ‘A study of specific open innovation issues from perspectives of open source and resources—The series cases of tesla’. Sustainability, 14(1), p. 142.
Xu, J. 2020. ‘Analysis of the operation strategy of Tesla Inc’. China. Frontiers in Economics and Management Research, 1, pp. 21-25.