Introduction
Rules and regulations play a crucial role in promoting social equity across the community spectrum. Over the decades, different laws governed human behavior and interaction across the nation. It is vital to establish inherent value enhancing moral and virtuous acts in this case. However, one of the challenges engulfs addressing the measures fostering punishment among the young offenders (Adegboyega, Idowu, and Idowu, 2019). The violation rules from juveniles demand the utilization of a disciplining approach. It is crucial to assess the critical aspect that advocates for the effectiveness scale in promoting recidivism among the lawbreakers under the overview of religious practices.
What is the influence of religious interventions in reducing recidivism among juvenile offenders?
The impact of religiosity in reducing recidivism depends on the coordination of the dynamic stakeholders. Juvenile offenders encounter distinct challenges based on the disciplinary options for violating the rules and regulations. Social justice is a phenomenon that enshrines the adept involvement of all entities in promoting equality despite the disparity in perspectives. According to research, it is the responsibility of the management to incorporate strategies that render efficiency scale in a change of character among the young lawbreakers (Johnson, 2021). Religion encapsulates an articulation of various morals and virtuous acts and the rewards for the apt adherence to the policies. The lack of institutionalizing punishment outlines minimal influence towards the intersection of the convicted offenders. The critical perception within the religion spectrum involves integrating sustainable practices that promote interdependence and community engagement in supporting juvenile offenders during rehabilitation. This study contributes to assessing the influence of religious values on alleviating recidivism among teenage culprits.
This chapter describes the methodology to be used to carry out the study. It presents the research design, target population, sample size, sampling techniques, data collection, and analysis. The section focuses on depicting the dynamic approaches and practices used in data collection, analysis, and presentation by the researcher. It is crucial to optimally provide details within the methodological chapter to enhance the integration between primary and secondary insights.
Research Design
The researcher will use exploratory research based on the survey design. Controlled structured questionnaires will be used to assess the influence of religious interventions in reducing recidivism among juvenile offenders, a qualitative technique. This method aids in increasing the interaction between the researcher and the stakeholders as well as increasing the accuracy of data. The use of dynamic materials to gather data, such as questionnaires and interviews, fosters an understanding regarding distinctive overviews from respondents.
Sample Size and Sampling Procedures
The researcher will use the sample size of 100 respondents and the stratified random sampling technique. The researcher categorized UK into sub-regions forming different divisions. The approach enhances the alleviation of bias in the random selection technique due to the profound coverage of the characters’ personalities and professionals. Apart from alleviating partisanship, the researcher uses a pilot study to affirm the effectiveness of the data collection materials from a non-participatory segment of the populace.
Data Collection Methods and Research Instruments
The researcher will use both structured and open-ended interviews as data collection instruments. These methods will enable the researcher to collect sufficient evidence that provides measures on juvenile offenders’ phenomenon. The use of questionnaires and interviews will provide an opportunity to address the array of religious interventions’ contributions in reducing recidivism among teenagers. The questionnaires will be administered to professionals, community members, government representatives, and religious leaders. Notably, the researcher will conduct interviews after booking an appointment with the authority’s employees.
The Questionnaire
The questionnaire is a tool used in the collection of data from individuals by answering a series of queries. The surveys will be designed for data collection. The tool will consist of an open letter introducing the researcher and the research topic to the respondent. Section A will comprise the respondents’ personal details to affirm the inclusivity of dynamic entities. Section B will be testing the relationship between religious intervention and recidivism among juvenile offenders. Section C will be testing the relationship between teenagers’ moral behavior and frequency in lawbreaking.
Piloting
A pilot study is an experiment designed to test logistics and gather information prior to a more extensive analysis in order to improve the latter’s quality and efficiency. It can reveal deficits in the design of a proposed experiment or procedure, and these can then be dealt with before time and resources are burnt up on a large-scale study. A preliminary training will be carried out in one of the strata that is not part of the sample to measure the validity and reliability of the research instruments used for the main study.
Validity
Validity is the accuracy of a research tool that shows that a research procedure is accurate, correct, authentic, meaningful, and right. The concept encapsulates integration of distinct perspectives and approaches to enhance efficiency scale during data collection process. The research instruments’ validity will be determined by their ability to answer the research questions. A pilot study will be conducted to ensure the research instruments’ validity.
Reliability
Reliability is the measure to which a research instrument yield constitutes results after repeated trials. The pilot study results will be used to improve the research instruments to realize the research objectives. Notably, data reliability will be measured using the test-retest method, whereby the researcher will administer questionnaires with queries that will have related answers to measure the reliability of the responses. A professional will administer the questionnaires to ensure that the questions are all answered. The main reason enshrines optimizing response rate from the literate and illiterate respondents.
Data Analysis
The data collected using questionnaires will be organized, tabulated, and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The approach renders appropriate comprehension concerning the interdependence of the distinctive variables improving the quality of living and social justice. It is crucial to enhance an in-depth comprehension of the responses and overviews while comparing the previous literature review details. The concept fosters objective derivation of insights regarding the influence of religious intervention in reducing recidivism among juvenile offenders.
Ethical Consideration
The ethics of carrying out this research will be highly considered through various means. To ensure ethics to the literature of other authors, articles, books, and journals, the researcher has documented the references as part of the appendix. Before the collection of primary data, the researcher will collect a letter from the relevant department as an approval that the researcher can gather the data courtesy of the University. In the field, the researcher will ensure that the structured questionnaires allow for the respondents’ confidentiality through signings and filling in personal details. Moreover, the questionnaires will be structured in a way that the age is to be filled in order to acknowledge there was total consideration of age differential and gender consideration as well.
Analysis of Data Collected
A significant percentage of the UK respondents agreed that religious interventions properly influence the reduction in recidivism among juvenile offenders. In this case, at least 96% of the respondents agreed, while 4% argued against the effectiveness of interdependence. In a different spectrum, 83% indicated that teenagers’ moral behavior is highly influenced by socio-cultural practices hence the relation to increased lawbreaking incidences. 17% provided a divergent opinion concerning adept measures to boost youngsters’ perception of virtuous acts arguing that exposure to poor parenting risks the criminal essence among the counterparts.
Juvenile justice is a controversial social issue that fosters debate across the criminal legal system. Dynamic leadership institutions’ responsibility is to establish the critical factor that impacts the nature of interactions and policies within a community. However, one of the crucial challenges engulfs determining the prominent influence of youths concerning disciplining measures. In this case, the U.S government implemented the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention’s (OJJDP’s) Formula Grants Program. The primary purpose of the institution encapsulates developing measures to avert teenagers at a higher risk of getting to the records for certain crimes by incorporating dynamic alternatives. The four vital requirements of the Act enshrine deinstitutionalizing state offenders, separation of adults and juveniles in jails, addressing the discordant minority presence in prisons, and optimal jettison of juniors from adult penitentiary settings (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2021). Eligibility standards significantly impact qualification towards the funding process of the OJJP mainframe, thus the importance of indicating relevance. Misconduct among the lads deserves proficient integration of punishment approaches that foster character change and development among the counterparts hence the necessity to assess dynamic institutions.
Distinct factors attribute to a teenager’s erratic behavior in a social setting hence the importance of determining key outliers that justify the utilization of the OJJP program. On the one hand, the framework contributes to the facilitation of different mainframes within the justice system. On the other hand, key outliers’ responsibility is to indicate the vital aspect of advancing alternatives concerning youngsters’ delinquency. According to research, during the adolescent stage, personnel encounters optimal challenges while discovering a social identity (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2021). As a result, it is crucial to incorporate a functional and effective support structure from dynamic leadership entities to boost the trickle-down essence of accrued benefits. The lack of standardized entities advocating for solutions upon the behavioral aspects among characters risks decreased growth within the region due to influential legal frameworks.
Punishment among law offenders is an issue that faces dynamic controversies due to the subjective interpretation of the moral and legal clauses. Over the decades, imprisonment played a vital role in enclosing criminals in secluded areas and persists in the mandate despite imminent problems, such as overcrowding, corruption, and juvenile sentencing (Grim B.J and Grim M.E, 2019). Researchers indicate that overcrowding in jails proficiently includes African Americans, hence assessing the core factor attributing to the increased population of felonious individuals (Labrecque et al., 2021). The sole purpose of the penitentiary enshrines offering the person an opportunity to rethink and change the behavior for better and harmonious living among people.
Over the decades, the central controversy lies in the debate about corporal punishment among juveniles. At least nineteen American states allow the practice to enhance the disciplining of the children during learning process. These regions mainly include Alabama, Louisiana, Arizona, Indiana, Missouri, Georgia, Arkansas, Kansas, Florida, Colorado, Idaho, Kentucky, and Mississippi (Heilbrun et al., 2017). The issue poses a legal challenge based on the child’s exposure to unhealthy growth and development due to the inflicted stress and depression. Therefore, the abolishment of the mainframe entails the protection of the juvenile against the profound threat of mental pressure.
The juveniles can waive their constitutional rights the same way as adults based on the influential elements on change of behavior and belief system. There are different statutory laws that protect teenagers during the waive process. One of the laws is the right to the limited essence of due process (Mowen, Stansfield, and Boman, 2018). It is evident from the Kent versus the United States case that the individual was granted the submission and treatment as an adult’s criminal case (Heilbrun et al., 2017). It is a phenomenon that renders the child an opportunity in court to defend their actions. Another construct is the right to counsel that enhances the representation and the chance for winning the case through the presented factual line (Abram, Jordan, and Montero, 2018). It is crucial to consider the right to confront the witnesses to assert the facts of the events that led to the crime the youth is accused of. The person also enjoys the right to the notification of charges during arrest as a form of ascertaining the justification for detention and harassment. Although a juvenile can waiver the rights, according to re Gault, the individual has the right against exposing themself to a particular criminal act.
Human behavior and character highly influence the nature of relations and engagements. Therefore, it is crucial to derive the documentation as an approach to justify the acts of an individual under different circumstances and empower employers with an insight regarding the trends of conduct (Whitehouse and Fitzgerald, 2020). The three main disposition options available to the juvenile court judge include house placement, probation, and suspended judgments. The three platforms offer a significant impact on the change in the habits of a person at younger years through dynamic insights (Heilbrun et al., 2017). These insights include the rehabilitation, skill development, and focusing on the crucial treatment strategies. Apart from the self-development goals, the procedures render a proficient baseline and justification of the public safety and implementation of a program fostering the integration to the community growth and progressive projects.
The teenager is served the juvenile sentencing first, and the lack of compliance renders the determination of adult sentencing. The different types of blended sentencing include juvenile-inclusive, juvenile-exclusive, criminal-inclusive, criminal-exclusive, and juvenile-contiguous (Abrams, Jordan, and Montero, 2018). The determination of punishment for the adolescent relies on the type of court. In the case that the individual gets arraigned in juvenile court, the person receives the juvenile sentencing and receives the adult sentencing once presented in an adult court (Stewart, Rapp-McCall, and Drum, 2019). Another factor that determines the category for adaptation is the punishment options for the individual. In this case, there is a profound disparity in the determination of the ruling for blended sentencing aiming to ensure the social welfare of the accused person.
Public opinion plays a crucial role in the implementation process of a policy due to the necessity to address divergent viewpoints. Strategies that aim at improving the growth and development of a region rely on the ability of the individuals’ endorsement. An excellent example of an approach is incorporating a community-based intervention enhancing the rehabilitation of criminal offenders (Sánchez-Iglesias, González-Castaño, and Molina, 2021). It is an initiative that requires coordination among all stakeholders to boost the performance outlier. On the one hand, guidelines establish the marginal expectation from particular interdependent theoretical frameworks. On the other hand, the mainframe is a reflection of the optimal contribution by all parties. According to Midgley (2019), the development of participatory asset mapping requires the optimal engagement of different people within a region to enhance the collection of crucial information. The mapping process reflects the profound impact on the establishment of action plans boosting the quality of service. Sustainable growth and development depend on integrating specific initiatives that enhance the relationship-building among dynamic participants while elevating the impact of social equity.
Conclusion
Succinctly, it is the responsibility of religious leaders to incorporate measures that enhance recidivism among juvenile offenders. The main reason engulfs the articulation of key-value in promoting morals and virtues among the entities. The sentencing of teenagers in a court offers the counterparts an opportunity to objectively defend their involvement in particular situations. In this case, it is crucial to establish the core approaches to improve character and perception concerning interactive platforms and environmental quotients.
Reference List
Abrams, L. S., Jordan, S. P., and Montero, L. A. (2018) ‘What is a juvenile? A cross-national comparison of youth justice systems’, Youth Justice, 18(2), pp.111-130. Web.
Adegboyega, L.O., Idowu, O.O. and Idowu, A.I. (2019) ‘Suggested Solutions to Recidivism by Prison Officers in Kwara State, Nigeria’, Indonesian Journal of Guidance and Counseling: Theory and Application, 8(2), pp.81-90. Web.
Grim, B.J. and Grim, M.E. (2019) ‘Belief, behavior, and belonging: How faith is indispensable in preventing and recovering from substance abuse’, Journal of Religion and Health, 58(5), pp.1713-1750. Web.
Heilbrun, K., DeMatteo, D., King, C., and Filone, S. (2017) Evaluating juvenile transfer and disposition: Law, science, and practice. Taylor & Francis. Web.
Johnson, B.R. (2021) ‘How religion contributes to the common good, positive criminology, and justice reform’, Religions, 12(6), p.402. Web.
Labrecque, R. M., Tostlebe, J. J., Useem, B., and Pyrooz, D. C. (2021) ‘Reforming solitary confinement: Oregon’s development, implementation, and processes of a restrictive housing step down reentry program’, Health & Justice, 9(1), pp.1-15. Web.
Midgley, J. (2019) Social policy and development: an overview. Handbook of Social Policy and Development. EdgarOnline. Web.
Mowen, T.J., Stansfield, R. and Boman, J.H. (2018) ‘During, after, or both? Isolating the effect of religious support on recidivism during re-entry’, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(4), pp.1079-1101. Web.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2021) State compliance with JJDP Act Core Requirements. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Web.
Sánchez-Iglesias, I., González-Castaño, M. and Molina, A.J. (2021) ‘Use of Causal Language in Studies on the Relationship between Spiritually-Based Treatments and Substance Abuse and Relapse Prevention’, Religions, 12(12), p.1075. Web.
Stewart, C., Rapp-McCall, L. and Drum, L. (2019) ‘The relationship of spirituality and mental health to recidivism’, Social Work & Christianity, 46(4), pp.1-4
Whitehouse, H. and Fitzgerald, R. (2020) ‘Fusion and reform: The potential for identity fusion to reduce recidivism and improve reintegration’, Anthropology in Action, 27(1), pp.1-13. Web.
Appendix: The Questionnaire
I am a student undertaking academic research entitled “The influence of religious intervention in reducing recidivism among juvenile offenders”. The result of the study will contribute to the development of a project which is the requirement for graduation. Kindly fill in the responses accurately. Confidentiality will be highly maintained.
Respondent’s signature…………………… Date……………….
Interviewer’s signature……………………
Date……………….
Section A: Social Economic Details (Kindly fill in the spaces and boxes provided)
Age:
- 0-19 [ ]
- 36-59 [ ]
- 20-35 [ ]
- 60 and above [ ]
Occupation:
- Businessman [ ] d)
- Farmer [ ]
- Student [ ]
- Self-employed [ ]
- Not employed [ ]
- Civil servant [ ]
Highest level of education attained:
- University level [ ]
- Secondary level [ ]
- College level [ ]
- Primary level [ ]
Gender:
- Male ( )
- Female ( )
Section B: Please suggest whether there is an impact of religious intervention to reducing recidivism among juvenile offenders
- Yes ( )
- No ( )
Section C: Please suggest whether there is a relationship between teenagers’ moral behavior and frequency in lawbreaking (kindly tick as appropriate)
- Yes ( )
- No ( )