Universal health care is aimed at offering an itemized health care bundle which will be of assistance to every individual of the society with the objective of making available economic risk safety, enhanced health outcomes and better-quality admittance to health facilities (Glasziou, Moynihan, Richards, & Godlee, 2013). Universal healthcare is the kind of health care strategy in which every individual of the society can obtain health treatment regardless of their social standing, revenue, age, sex, race, previous illnesses, and financial status. This means that any individual, legally residing in the area where universal health care is adopted, automatically qualifies for universal health care.
Universal care advantages
Equivalent admission to healthcare
The key benefit of this category of health care is that it offers individuals unable to pay for health care the facilities they need. This health care organization offers simple health care services to all residents, and it does not segregate anyone. It benefits those who are not working or have other complications when trying to get health care in a moment of need (Bisht, 2013). This is possibly the utmost benefit of universal health care as every individual following this type of health strategy can be capable of accessing health care regardless of his or her social standing. Taking into consideration the fact that all people are equal, the poor should be able to obtain the same sort of health care that could only be paid for by a wealthy individual under regular conditions (Bisht, 2013). This category of health care does not categorize or differentiate. It provides all the members of the society with equal rights when it comes to health care.
Public health development
The whole population contributes to the health care budget so every individual can get the elementary care that they require at any rate. This kind of health care will benefit in refining the health of the overall populace since every member of the society has an identical admittance to the health care (Bisht, 2013). Consequently, it will cause the decrease in the number of complaints filed by the overall population, form a healthier society, and improve efficiency. The residents can get unrestricted treatments for the uncomplicated situations without the distress of not being capable of paying for them (Bisht, 2013). This can assist in reducing the prevalence of communicable illnesses and other public health difficulties that most of the individuals may disregard if they do not have enough money for the health care.
Commercial and economic benefits
More than a half of the American population is appreciating health coverage through their company in the private segment. The high price that is connected to compensating the worker’s health coverage puts the US private industries at a competitive disadvantage in the global market (Bisht, 2013). With universal healthcare, remote industries can make space for the deposit use for health coverage. This would be beneficial for other areas of their commerce. This could decrease company labor charges by more than 15% (Tangcharoensathien & Evans, 2013). Certainly, individuals work more when they live better lives which permit them to subsidize as much as they can to the country’s budget. Universal health care is a means of raising the standard level of living of every member of the society which will cause an increase in financial output.
Universal care disadvantages
Collectivist government
The current US health care market is represented by a free marketplace organization. Basically, market services regulate the obtainability and price of health care services (Bisht, 2013). The implementation of universal health care will cause a massive alteration in the economy. It could be an initial step in the direction of the government monitoring other features of the country budget. The universal health care will diminish the sum of money medics can make (Bisht, 2013). This could generate the deficiency in medical experts in the long-run. Those with advanced revenues may protest that their income is going to serve as the payment option for the health care of other people when it should be a payment option for their own health care.
Government debt growth
This is perhaps the main argument against the universal health care. Employing an individual financier health care system creates an upsurge in taxes as the organization requires to be paid for (Bisht, 2013). The total costs of the system can be rather challenging for the country’s budget and trigger large debts. The existing US management health care agendas, such as Medicare, are now putting an enormous tension on the public budget. A universal healthcare program would be equal to a massive growth in management costs and debt (Bisht, 2013). The country’s administration is not excellent in managing complex organizations, and the fact that the government manages health care can trigger numerous complications (Bisht, 2013).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the single financier organization in the US is challenged by the entangled radical and strategical difficulties that are insoluble. For many years, the United States are confronted by a deficiency in expenses controls, and this cannot be corrected instantly. At present, the single financier health organization is not governmentally feasible, and the price attached to it is disproportionate. There would be a decrease in the eminence of health care, and numerous people would lose their jobs if this plan is executed.
References
Bisht, R. (2013). Universal Health Care: The Changing International Discourse. Indian Journal of Public Health, 57(4), 236-241.
Glasziou, P., Moynihan, R., Richards, T., & Godlee, F. (2013). Too Much Medicine; Too Little Care. BMJ, 347(2), 3-21.
Tangcharoensathien, V., & Evans, D. (2013). Beyond Clinical Skills: Key Capacities needed for Universal Health Coverage. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91(11), 45-49. Web.