Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Christian ethics, or the moral teaching of Christianity, determines the ethical guidelines of human behavior. Christianity’s ethics is expressed in a Christian ethos, a certain style of life, diverse in its manifestations and inherent in both individuals and large social groups. People who follow Christian ethics have a high level of spirituality; in other words, they keep track of their thoughts and feelings and try to direct them according to their religion. The actions and behavior of Christ, as well as His very way of life, are an example and standard for His followers. Christian ethics emphasizes the need for grace and mercy (including the forgiveness of sins) for a human, the source of which is God.

Representatives of postmodern relativism take a different point of view on ethical issues. Relativism is a philosophical doctrine that claims that all knowledge is relative, and there is no absolute truth. There are only truths that a particular person or culture accepts. This is the point of view according to which all this is a subjective result of various conventions and systems of assessment. Where is truth, and where is falsehood, what is right and wrong, what are the standards of reasoning – answers to these questions are also subjective. The importance of these judgments and conclusions is limited by the context that gave rise to them. In the health care sector, ethical issues are determined by standards set by government systems. They do not rely on people’s religious beliefs but on rational judgments built in a secular society. This allows the creation of certain standards that empower health care professionals to act and make decisions even at critical moments.

Scientism is a general pejorative name for an ideological position that represents scientific knowledge as the highest cultural value and a fundamental factor in human interaction with the world. Scientism itself is not a coherent system of views but rather can be seen as a certain orientation of various systems that have gained widespread popularity. They are now a part of the opinions of researchers and the general public. Scientism can be defined as a science viewed as a religion since researchers elevate it to dogma’s rank, which they turn into an imperative (Ridder, Peels & Woudenberg, 2018). Often, people accepted scientism consider physics or mathematics to be exemplary sciences and call to build other sciences in their image and likeness. The term scientism has a significant pejorative connotation. The term scientism is rarely used as a self-name but is used by critics of this concept.

According to anti-scientism, by invading all spheres of human life, science makes people soulless, devoid of romance and a human face. Those who accept scientism as the primary belief stop seeing the world’s beauty and try to explain any event with rational arguments. This narrows their horizons and emotional range, which can negatively affect their quality of life. In addition, the suppression of individual and natural principles in a person reduces all the diversity of the personality to only one technocratic parameter. A modern person, in particular a technical specialist, is subject to a large number of overloads and stresses, and these circumstances indicate a painful and abnormal state of modern society. Not only specialists in technical specialties but also humanities are squeezed by the grip of normativeness and obligation.

Ultimate reality is something that stands above the surrounding world perceived by a person. It cannot be described, defined, and cognized by a rational intellect. In other words, it is something beyond human understanding. It is a collection of all real objects and what stands behind them – spiritual and emotional. In particular, some believe that God is the ultimate reality: He is everything, and everything is Him. However, in any case, this kind of reality cannot be expressed in words since the human brain alone cannot process and convey this phenomenon.

The world of dense matter, characterized by three-dimensional space, linear time, and inexorable causality, does not in itself have an independent existence. It is not the only true reality that materialistic science portrays. The world did not arise by chance, by itself. This world is the Creation of Absolute Consciousness. In the light of these insights, the material world of our daily life, including our body, appears to be a complex interweaving of misperceptions and interpretations. Our Universe, containing countless myriads of stars, worlds, separate entities, and elements, by its deepest nature is a Living Being of infinite scale and unimaginable complexity. The greatness of this Creation is incomprehensible to our material mind.

Humans social beings with reason and consciousness and a subject of social and historical activity and culture. People’s specific features that distinguish them from other animals are upright walking, a highly developed brain, thinking, and articulate speech. People study and change themselves and the world around them, creating a culture and history. The essence of people, their origin and purpose, and their place in the world have been and remain the main problems of philosophy, religion, science, and art. The distinctive features of a human are the ability to think, exercise free choice, take responsibility for actions, and the presence of moral judgments. Not a single other creature is known that has higher emotions, traditions, the ability to think, affirm, deny, count, plan, knows about its mortality, loves in the real sense of the word, has a sense of humor, realizes goals, reproduces what is available, and creates what something new.

Knowledge is a result of cognition that can be logically or factually substantiated and empirically or practically tested. According to the widespread interpretation of modern epistemology, knowledge is a real state of affairs, a person’s conviction based on facts and rational arguments. Speaking of knowledge, most often, people mean the reflection of reality in the consciousness of a person. Science and its methods aim to obtain knowledge about the structure of objects and phenomena, about their essential interrelationships. Knowledge is the opposite of ignorance (lack of information), but it is also opposed to faith. Usually, knowledge is objectified, fixed, expressed in language or some other sign system, sign form. However, depending on what is meant by knowledge, it can be argued that knowledge can also be fixed in sensory images, obtained through direct perception.

My ethics base is not doing evil to other people. I believe that every person has positive qualities at heart. Each of us is originally born free, kind, loving, and open. Unfortunately, during the life process, people change and get traumatized. They close up, become angry or sad, sometimes even cruel. However, behind all this is a naive and scared child, in whom there is nothing bad or evil. Therefore, I try to treat others with understanding and empathy, even if they behave the way I think is not right. It helps me build relationships with people, better understand their behavior, and cultivate my own moral qualities. I try to teach close people this position because such an understanding is something that many modern people lack. I hope that, in the future, we will be able to understand each other and treat people with patience and trust.

The purpose of my existence is to create or accomplish something that will make this world a better place. I suppose that it is a primary goal for many people because it is something that is worth living for. At the moment, I cannot determine exactly what it will be, but I am trying to find this action or work. This can be the birth of children and teaching positive moral values ​​to them. It could be a work of art or a company that has a beneficial effect on the world. Perhaps I will find myself in political activity and be able to change the structure of a certain part of the planet for the best. In any case, I try to move towards realizing my potential and improving the world.

Reference

Ridder, J., Peels, R., & Woudenberg, R. (2018). Scientism: Prospects and problems. Oxford University Press.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, August 19). Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory. https://studycorgi.com/worldview-analysis-and-personal-inventory-essay-examples/

Work Cited

"Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory." StudyCorgi, 19 Aug. 2022, studycorgi.com/worldview-analysis-and-personal-inventory-essay-examples/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory'. 19 August.

1. StudyCorgi. "Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory." August 19, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/worldview-analysis-and-personal-inventory-essay-examples/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory." August 19, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/worldview-analysis-and-personal-inventory-essay-examples/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory." August 19, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/worldview-analysis-and-personal-inventory-essay-examples/.

This paper, “Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.