In the film 12 Angry Men, a jury comprised of 12 men is attempting to determine the guilt of a defendant under reasonable doubt. The discussion is emotionally tense and difficult for all participants, as evidence is continuously examined and re-examined. Despite initially coming to an almost consensus, the characters are slowly swayed to change their perceptions of the case. During the shared discussion, the jury examines the evidence, and witness testimonies, tests theories, and verifies the probability of events against hard facts.
Behaviors, Dynamics, and Truth
Influence of Group Mentality
Risky Behavior theory proposes that individuals tend to make more extreme decisions when part of a group, compared to working individually. As a result of this tendency, group decisions can become riskier than an average person’s approach, resulting in a bold decision-making process.
Experiments such as Milgram’s Obedience studies also demonstrate the effect group participation can have on a person’s perception or decision-making skills. The results of the study showed that individuals were capable of inflicting harm on others as long as it was justified by an authority figure. Similarly, Asch Conformity Experiment showed that in the presence of a majority, people are likely to conform to others’ views.
Role of Diversity
The difference in perspectives and diversity played a vital role in reaching a more nuanced verdict. In particular, the disagreement of jury 8 with the rest of the men is what led them to start questioning the details of the case in the first place. Similarly, diversity of perspectives, people’s backgrounds, and identities give groups a better capacity for decision-making. The inclusion of varied viewpoints promotes a sense of inquiry and works toward reaching the truth of the matter.
Profiling Jurors
Juries are people taken to reach a unanimous decision through the consideration of facts, varied perspectives, and introspection into a case. Specifically choosing people that are likely to conclude defeats the point of choosing a jury of more than one person.
Balancing Truth and Justice
To reach truth and justice, it is necessary to amplify diversified voices and carefully examine the evidence. By giving people the tools and confidence to speak their minds and be heard, it is possible to widen the possible pool of outcomes. Individuals from different backgrounds, engaging in a good-faith discussion are better able to promote justice.