Introduction
Color blindness is an issue that faces prominent controversies to promote unity. Racism causes marginalization based on categorizing ethnic groups either as superior or inferior (Alhumam 160). Over the decades, African Americans encountered discrimination based on color distinction against the whites. Discrimination highly affects the interaction among individuals due to the essence of establishing inferiority and superiority. Historically, the slave trade thrived cause of the prominent economic impact across distinct regions. Slavery was an essential factor due to the counterparts’ significant business profitability and productivity. During the 1700s and 1800s, after the arrival of the Europeans in America, the demand for cheap labor intensified for the tilling of the plantations (Alhumam 161). Therefore, colonizers noticed an opportunity to exploit Africans as an avenue of accumulating wealth. As a result, distinct foundations fostered the necessity of inequality to establish the effectiveness of inferiority and superiority complex. Notably, racism evolved from slave trade to distinct socio-cultural foundational practices negatively influencing the peaceful coexistence among people within a territorial setting.
Proficiency in social work is a multidimensional phenomenon that requires acquiring advanced knowledge and skills during interaction. The expertise enshrines such facets as communication, cultural competence, organization, critical thinking, active listening, and advocacy. Primarily, it is crucial for the personnel to establish relations with the community members to enhance the gathering of vital details regarding the welfare and the challenges affecting the growth and development (Bell et al. 3). Distinct ethnic groups foster different customs and norms, hence establishing a functional framework enhancing the recognition and appreciation of dynamic perspectives (Hobson 01:23-03:00). Diversity is a platform that ensures sharing of information and strategies regarding equity and effectiveness in service delivery through the programs.
Racism Against African Americans
Racism is one of the common social problems within the American community, thus incorporating competent solutions through policies. Discrimination based on ethnic identity is a problem that renders the unequal distribution of resources, leading to the groups’ marginalization. However, introducing guidelines regarding the engagements and interaction among the personnel improves participation in the growth and development and trickle-down effect of the benefits (Allen et al. 41). The action plan that involves alleviating the matter requires the establishment of interdependence between the interests of the public domain and the ideal approaches. Therefore, the procedure entails defining the problem, identifying the available community-based resources, and determining the core factors promoting equity across the domain.
The prevalence of racism as a social-based issue significantly affects the learning process of African Americans in senior public high school. It is a phenomenon contributing to the hindrance in accessing specific resources and privileges. An excellent example is awarding a Black student in the sporting events and instead overshadowing an individual from another ethnic group. The limited access to opportunities that elevate career growth demotivates the student from participating in certain activities, prompting crime and drug abuse (Allen et al. 43). Discrimination is a profound barrier towards imminent growth and development.
The fight against racism is a multidimensional ideology that involves the intersectionality of different variables to enhance the effectiveness of the outcome. A standard social policy that attributes to the importance of equity is the right to education among all Americans. It is a facet that focuses on empowering individuals with knowledge and skills for career growth and development. The practice provides the mainframe on addressing the critical problem affecting the ethnic groups within the territory enshrining discrimination. The concept highly affects the senior public high school population based on integrating aspects that improve the interaction among persons from different communities (Bell et al. 4). Heterogeneity is an essential factor that attributes to social learning and acquisition of identity within the scope of the civil routines.
Equality within the populace renders the emergence of a dynamic overview of mental healthiness. In most cases, children get cognitively altered to function under antisocial behavioral prospects through the theorem. Although it is an independent form of empowerment, poor mentorship fosters cognitive structures’ negative development. Individuals further appreciate destructive actions at puberty and adulthood without the stress of punishment (Bell et al. 5). In other cases, a person realizes the consequence of witnessing racism as a foundation of poor social relations. Therefore, the lack of attention to the problems affecting the interaction among students in senior public high school risks the barrier to sociological growth and development.
Over the decades, multicultural diversity and gender difference foster a prominent framework regarding the indirect discrimination among minority groups in the workplace. The primary role of the human resource manager enshrines establishing policies and regulations that guide the engagements among the employees (Madera 100). In this case, there is a proficient interdependent relationship between the involved parties and the level of productivity. The optimal influence towards the workers risks direct and indirect discrimination, mainly among non-Hispanic ethnic teams. An excellent example of a rambling strategy that segregates the target sect encapsulates the implementation of policies that limit the working hours of the laborers.
Indirect discrimination is an aspect in the workplace that negatively influences the development of an effective organizational culture. Implementing human resource management policies segregating workers from minority groups highly impacts the productivity scale (Madera 101). An excellent example of a guideline that poses marginalization is the lack of a part-time slot for mothers. In this case, a woman with a toddler faces the challenge of balancing the duties and attention due to the severe condition at the organization. As a result, the employee resigns due to the restraint from the regulatory mainframe. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a system that accommodates the needs of the staff to avoid the increase in turnover rates.
Human resource management proficiently impacts the productivity in an organization due to the prominent influence on employees’ welfare. However, implementing policy frameworks that indirectly discriminate the workers from minority groups contributes to developing a dysfunctional organizational culture (Madera 103). Therefore, it is the responsibility of the administrative team to establish approaches that boost the engagement of all workers to alleviate the risks of high turnover rates and poor performance index.
The policy decision is a multifaceted phenomenon highly affected by biases in its interpretation and implementation process. Allen et al. argue that there are two significant forms of prejudice: technical and issue (45). Technical bias refers to utilizing the evidence without following the scientific principles. It is the persistent use of subjective arguments to disregard the objective facts approved by scientific experiments and baseline. Therefore, the central focus of technical bias ideology entails testing the fidelity of the scientific facts. The other form of partisanship is the problem that refers to social values’ influence on the development of certain mythical constructs. Essentially, issue bias focuses on the justification of the social factors in disregarding specific policies, especially the concept of democratic representation.
Technical bias is mainly utilized to interpret scientific factors such as health-based issues. In most cases, the policymakers use the idea to enhance sustainability and minimize the incurred costs. Nevertheless, it is essential that policymakers appreciate the scientific facts based on the best health initiative due to the necessity of boosting the health standards. Objective arguments rely on evidence to ascertain the concepts (Bell et al. 6). Over the decades, it is a phenomenon that has rendered the emergence of issues related to the implementation of policies by health workers in real life. It is vital that the policymakers focus on integrating the scientific facts with the perceived argumentative constructs to enhance the effectiveness of the policy implementation.
Issue bias is a concept regarding the dynamism influence of social factors on the development of policies. In most cases, individuals debate specific ideas based on the value derived from the engagements. With the aim of solving the issue of disagreements, people resolve to utilize democracy in the determination of the best alternatives. As a result, objective facts are compromised by the influence of social dynamism (Bell et al. 8). In essence, the social factor of justice through numbers alters the impact and significance of objective argumentative constructs. Therefore, issue bias is a significant threat to human society based on consumptive social values such as unsustainable practices. Policymakers in the health sector focus on integrating social values and scientific facts to enhance the development of effective healthcare policies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, racism is an issue that prominently impacts social construct across the US society. One of the frameworks that foster significant differences among ethnic groups is comparing skin color to determine the privileges. It is the responsibility of key stakeholders to establish effective policies that contribute to the alleviation of discriminative tendencies. Inclusivity fosters optimal distribution of accrued benefits across the social mainframe. Therefore, it is crucial to focus on the Americans’ color blindness and bravery approach. Color blind focuses on the capacity of the populace to provide equal opportunities to all groups despite the identity. Color brave is an overview that renders resilience among African Americans.
Works Cited
Alhumam, Ibrahim. “Reflections on Racism in American Schools.” Journal of Education and Practice 6.11 (2015): 160-161.
Allen, Walter R., et al. “From Bakke to Fisher: African American students in US higher education over forty years.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 4.6 (2018): 41-72.
Bell, Caryn N., et al. “Racial non-equivalence of socioeconomic status and self-rated health among African Americans and Whites.” SSM-population health 10 (2020): 100561.
Hobson, Mellody. “Color Blind Or Color Brave? | Mellody Hobson”. Youtube.Com, 2014, Web.
Madera, Juan M. “Situational perspective taking as an intervention for improving attitudes toward organizations that invest in diversity management programs.” Journal of Business and Psychology 33.3 (2018): 100-111.