The Intersectionality of Race, Bias, and Health

Public health is a complex, multifactorial discipline, comprising a wide range of factors. The internal connections between those factors are highly important in the clinical environment, as they inevitably influence nursing outcomes. Bias and racial disparities form an area of major concern for contemporary society, in general, and the issue remains topical in healthcare, as well. Despite significant progress in recent years, racial prejudices remain within society. Bias permeates various aspects of human activities, including the public health system. If medical institutions allow stereotypes to dictate the nature of the relations with their patients, there will be dire consequences emerging from both ends. If a person’s treatment is determined by his race and the medical team’s bias, the effectiveness of procedures will significantly decrease. Consequently, this person is bound to lose trust in the system and avoid seeking professional help. Thus, the health inequities will persist and become even worse.

Racial disparities within the context of the healthcare system have been an area of intense interest for researchers and journalists for decades. The article written by Vann R. Newkirk II is devoted to one of the most outrageous and racist experiments in the history of American healthcare, namely the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. In brief, the experiment implied observations of syphilitic black men over the course of their lives in order to see whether the debilitating disease influenced them differently. However, none of the men knew they participated in a research experiment or even had syphilis at all. As a result, most of them died or were extremely damaged by the disease without proper treatment. The article in question argues that the Tuskegee Study had a lasting impact on the African American health inequity. It simultaneously helped a dangerous disease circulate within these communities and accelerated “accelerated an erosion of trust in doctors” (Newkirk II). This article contributes to a better understanding of how racial disparities become rooted in public health. The mistakes come at a great cost, having consequences in terms of nursing outcomes and health-seeking behavior of the population,

Work Cited

Newkirk II, Vann R. “A Generation of Bad Blood.” The Atlantic, 2016, Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

StudyCorgi. (2022, July 30). The Intersectionality of Race, Bias, and Health. https://studycorgi.com/the-intersectionality-of-race-bias-and-health/

Work Cited

"The Intersectionality of Race, Bias, and Health." StudyCorgi, 30 July 2022, studycorgi.com/the-intersectionality-of-race-bias-and-health/.

* Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document

References

StudyCorgi. (2022) 'The Intersectionality of Race, Bias, and Health'. 30 July.

1. StudyCorgi. "The Intersectionality of Race, Bias, and Health." July 30, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-intersectionality-of-race-bias-and-health/.


Bibliography


StudyCorgi. "The Intersectionality of Race, Bias, and Health." July 30, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-intersectionality-of-race-bias-and-health/.

References

StudyCorgi. 2022. "The Intersectionality of Race, Bias, and Health." July 30, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-intersectionality-of-race-bias-and-health/.

This paper, “The Intersectionality of Race, Bias, and Health”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Please use the “Donate your paper” form to submit an essay.