Bartels, J. (2019). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment, again: Examining demand characteristics in the guard orientation. Journal of Social Psychology, 159(6), 780–790.
Abuse between guards and prisoners is an imminent factor attributed to the differential margin on duties and responsibilities. Bartels (2019) agrees that aggression from professionals is a consequential necessity to achieving the key goal of convicts’ submission to the commands. The research focuses on understanding correspondent behavioral conduct among the jailors and realizes that the two vital elements contributing to the negative outcome engulf prisoner’s mindset and the relative hostility.
On the one hand, a convict’s perception of the lockup entails unjust treatment. On the other hand, the warden adheres to the script on enhancing change of character among the inmates. There is an interdependent relationship between correction officer’s response system and the jailbird’s personality and attitude to the social justice structure. The study is applicable to the analysis of the behavioral characteristics of people at different levels of power. The study contributes to the understanding of the guard’s behavior, which can be used both in the analysis of the behavioral deviations of real wardens and in modeling situations in which the patient takes a dominant position.
Bottoms, S. (2014). Timeless cruelty: Performing the Stanford prison experiment. Performance Research, 19(3), 162–175.
Different approaches foster dynamic effect and comprehension on the Stanford prison experiment. Bottoms (2014) states that the investigation of the relationship between guards and prisoners rendered maltreatment and the use of unhealthy tactics as punishment. During the examination, Bottoms (2014) associates the aggrssion to timeless performance. The warden’s response to prisoners is a reflection to the customary essence of displaying superiority while fostering fear among the counterparts. The lack of institutional policies advocating for proficient treatment threatens the implementation of sustainable governing practices in jails.
The conceptual framework aptly applies in learning facilities due to the incorporation of standardized implementational outline. It is the core responsibility of relevant stakeholders in the education sector to integrate stage show with thematic constructs on topical issues for understanding. The study contributes to understanding the problem of fear and disapproval as factors that can guide a person’s behavior even in situations that threaten their own moral and physical health. Deviations based on the fear of separation from the team are normal manifestations of human nature, but may require adjustment.
Berteaux, J. (2021). Humankind: A hopeful history. Comparative Civilizations Review, 85, 200–202.
The existence of himan society regards the dependence on developed rules and regulations. Berteaux (2021) indicates that individuals’ personalities is an outcome from the socio-cultural constructs within a spectrum. The researcher explores and compares variant philosophies to understand the prevalent nature of evil. Berteaux’s (2021) emerges from the existing dynamism on character and perceptive gradients among personnel. The initiative fosters the justification of exploiting the legal framework as the central disciplinary guideline among people while determining the procedural perspective on problem-solving.
The effectiveness of social movements lies in the ability to attain the knowledge to cognitively and culturally address the social issues of the governance system. Social control and the justice system significantly contribute to the equal distribution of resources such as healthcare benefits and job opportunities. The concept in the scholarly material advances implementation outline on change of prisoners’ erratic behavior (Berteaux, 2021). The study is applicable to reasoning about health situations associated with unsustainable behavior. The basis for assistance is an understanding of the nature of offenses and recourse to disciplinary norms.
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2019). Rethinking the nature of cruelty: The role of identity leadership in the Stanford prison experiment. American Psychologist, 74(7), 809–822.
Identity leadership profoundly influences the interactive quotient among participants in a working environment. Haslam et al. (2019) postulate that effective engagement and outcome in a team relies on determining the core objectives of the activity. Primarily, the initiative involves associating the goals with personal satisfaction and pride as the group mentality. Haslam et al. (2019) explore the Stanford prison experiment to justify the formative constructs and realize distinctive insights. The regulation of informational access among people concerning aspects triggering conflicts enhances peaceful coexistence.
Essentially, incorporating measures that stipulate the essence of moral behavior among people renders a platform for learning the best character development perspectives. Superintendency is a constructive endeavor on improvement of value exchange among members to amplify performance levels on tasks completion and subordination to distinctive expectations. A view of the experiment from the position of defining leadership can be applied to situations associated with a violation of the self-perception of a person with leadership qualities. Although inflated self-esteem is often a deviation, it can be used as a tool through which the leader unites the team.
Laycock, J. P. (2017). The Stanford Prison Experiment Alvarez Kyle Patrick. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 20(4), 145–146.
Human behavior is formed under the conditions of the environment, bad deeds are often the result of the influence of deviant established norms. In the Stanford experiment, striking cruelty was a manifestation of rapid adaptation to new environmental conditions. Laycock (2017) analyzes the revealed aspects of the experiment, reviewing the film by Kyle Patrick Alvarez. Despite the fact that the experiment had a lot of negative reviews, which could indicate the irrelevance of the conclusions of the experiment, its results cannot be called into question. The main conclusion, which is emphasized by both the creator of the experiment and director Kyle Patrick Alvarez, remains unchanged – the environment shapes human behavior, often revealing the darkest sides of the psyche. Laycock’s research links the facts together and allows one to reason about the nature of aggression. This information can be used to guide treatment options for violent behavior disorders. Removing the trigger, changing the environment, and working on the past can help with healing.
Nye, B. (2014). Cognitive modeling of socially transmitted affordances: A computational model of behavioral adoption tested against archival data from the Stanford prison experiment. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 20(3), 302–337.
There is a significant interdependence between the cognitive psychological overview’s conscious and unconscious response systems. Consciousness impacts human behaviour. According to research, cognition is an outcome of the cognitive unconscious (Nye, 2014). In this case, the cognitive unconscious entails an interplay of various mental processes without the person’s conscious. Consciousness optimally contributes to the behaviour based on short-term and long-term memory to demonstrate the receptive behaviour (Nye, 2014). An excellent example of cognition is recalling a childhood experience that renders the association and bond with another individual.
The Stanford prison experiment offers an in-depth evaluation into the necessity of enhancing cognitive modelling on the relationship between the guards and the inmates. Therefore, it is crucial to boost and promote psychological mainframes on personality development to advance the ethical and moral adherence among convicts. The research makes a significant contribution to the behavioral foundations regarding the creation of strong associative unconscious connections. This information may be applicable to dealing with attachment deviations based on deep cognitive responses.
Sullivan, D. (2021). The use and misuse of the experimental method in social psychology: A critical examination of classical research. History & Philosophy of Psychology, 22(1), 47–49.
Social psychology significantly contributes to the apprehension on human behavior and key elements fostering variation on perceptive insights. Sullivan (2021) exploits the initiatives on the importance natural experimentations against the abstract foundations. Sullivan (2021) establishes that the misuse and use of the scientific study encapsulates utilization of objective gradients on experimentations. It is the vital mandate of investigators to integrate ordinary foundations on behavioral quotients to derive actionable and reliable intelligence. Social classification entails the interplay of the various sociological components to establish the position of an individual.
The significance of this interplay involves the derivation of societal identity among people as well as negatively fostering the stratification of distributing opportunities. The ideological perspective involves the acceptance of the offender in society after serving the assigned jail sentence. As a result, it is crucial to integrate restorative justice within the criminal justice system akin to reliable experimentation protocols. The study can be used to understand the nature of sociopathic deviations and adjustment disorders. Everyone has the right to help integrate into the community.
References
Bartels, J. (2019). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment, again: Examining demand characteristics in the guard orientation. Journal of Social Psychology, 159(6), 780–790.
Berteaux, J. (2021). Humankind: A hopeful history. Comparative Civilizations Review, 85, 200–202.
Bottoms, S. (2014). Timeless Cruelty: Performing the Stanford Prison Experiment. Performance Research, 19(3), 162–175.
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2019). Rethinking the nature of cruelty: The role of identity leadership in the Stanford prison experiment. American Psychologist, 74(7), 809–822.
Laycock, J. P. (2017). The Stanford Prison Experiment Alvarez Kyle Patrick. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 20(4), 145–146.
Nye, B. (2014). Cognitive modeling of socially transmitted affordances: A computational model of behavioral adoption tested against archival data from the Stanford prison experiment. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 20(3), 302–337.
Sullivan, D. (2021). The use and misuse of the experimental method in social psychology: A critical examination of classical research. History & Philosophy of Psychology, 22(1), 47–49.